2026 Bimota KB4RC vs 2026 Honda CBR1000RR - Spec Comparison
Choose up to 4 bikes to compare
2026 Bimota KB4RC
The 2026 Bimota KB4RC shares its 1043cc Kawasaki-derived inline-four (140 HP) and trellis-and-billet chassis with the standard KB4, positioned as the sportier-focused variant in Bimota's KB4 line. It carries the same Brembo brakes, quick-shifter-ready six-speed gearbox and carbon-fibre bodywork as the KB4, aimed at riders who want the naked KB4's engine and handling in a more track-oriented package.
2026 Honda CBR1000RR
The 2026 Honda CBR1000RR is a track-focused superbike engineered for experienced riders seeking precision and performance. Its 1,000cc liquid-cooled inline-four engine delivers aggressive power paired with advanced suspension and dual front brakes for exceptional control. Best known for its sharp handling and reliability, this machine excels on closed courses and demanding road riding.
2026 Bimota KB4RC vs 2026 Honda CBR1000RR: the key differences
Both are sport bikes, so this is a like-for-like choice.
- The 2026 Honda CBR1000RR makes 48.9 hp more (140.1 vs 189 hp).
- The 2026 Bimota KB4RC has a 23 mm lower seat (810 vs 833 mm), which helps shorter riders.
- The 2026 Bimota KB4RC carries 3.2 litres more fuel (19.5 vs 16.3 L).
2026 Bimota KB4RC: Built for spirited canyon carving and track-day performance, prioritizing razor-sharp handling over practicality.
2026 Honda CBR1000RR: It's built primarily for spirited canyon carving and track-day performance rather than commuting or long-distance touring.
Verdict: Choose the 2026 Bimota KB4RC if you want a lower seat and a bigger tank. Choose the 2026 Honda CBR1000RR if you want more power. Check the full table below for every figure, and the size comparison for fit.
| Specification | 2026 Bimota KB4RC | 2026 Honda CBR1000RR |
|---|---|---|
| Other | ||
| Category | Sport | Sport |
| Color Options | Black/yellow/gold/red | Pearl White |
| Comments | Carbon fiber bodywork. | - |
| Fuel Tank Material | - | Metal |
| Rake | - | 23.4º |
| Engine | ||
| Capacity: | 1043.0 ccm (63.65 cubic inches) | 999.0 ccm (60.96 cubic inches) |
| CO2 Emissions | ✓5 CO2 g/km | ✓142 CO2 g/km |
| Engine Type | In-line four, four-stroke | In-line four, four-stroke |
| Bore x Stroke | 77.0 x 56.0 mm (3.0 x 2.2 inches) | 76.0 x 55.1 mm (3.0 x 2.2 inches) |
| Compression | 11.8:1 | 13.0:1 |
| Cooling System | Liquid | Liquid |
| Fuel System | Injection | Injection |
| Starting | Electric | Electric |
| Valves Per Cylinder | 4 | 4 |
| Lubrication System | Forced Lubrication, wet sump | - |
| EPA Certificate No. | - | THNXC01.0CFA-002 |
| EPA Est. Fuel Consumption | - | 6.05 L/100km (38.9 US mpg) |
| EPA CO Emissions | - | 0.8 CO g/km |
| Ignition | - | Full Transistorized |
| Aspiration | - | Naturally aspirated |
| Performance | ||
| Power | 140.1 HP (103.6 kW) @ 10000 RPM | ✓189.0 HP (139.0 kW) |
| Torque | 111.0 Nm (11.3 kgf-m or 81.9 ft.lbs) @ 8000 RPM | - |
| Power/Weight Ratio | 0.7492 HP/kg (dry) | 1.0523 HP/kg (dry) |
| Chassis & suspension | ||
| Frame | Front frame trellis made by Hi-resistance steel with Aluminum alloy plates billet machined | Diamond; aluminium composite twin spar |
| Front Suspension | Öhlins front fork FG R and and T 43 NIX30 | 43mm telescopic fork; 4.7 in. travel |
| Rear Suspension | Aluminum alloy Swingarm billet with Öhlins ttX 36 | Unit Pro-Link® single shock; 5.4 in. travel |
| Front Wheel Travel | 130 mm (5.1 inches) | 119 mm (4.7 inches) |
| Rear Wheel Travel | 122 mm (4.8 inches) | 137 mm (5.4 inches) |
| Rake (fork angle) | 24.0° | 23.0° |
| Trail | 101 mm (4.0 inches) | 97 mm (3.8 inches) |
| Ground Clearance | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | 127 mm (5.0 inches) |
| Transmission | ||
| Gearbox | 6-speed | 6-speed |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Final Drive | Chain | Chain |
| Clutch | Wet, multi-disc | Multiplate wet |
| Brakes & wheels | ||
| Front Brakes | Double disc | Dual hydraulic calipers w/ 320mm discs |
| Front Brakes Diameter | 320 mm (12.6 inches) | 320 mm (12.6 inches) |
| Rear Brakes | Single disc | Single hydraulic caliper w/ 220mm disc |
| Front Tyre | 120/70-Z17 | 120/70ZR-17 |
| Rear Tyre | 190/50-ZR17 | 190/50ZR-17 |
| Rear Brakes Diameter | - | 220 mm (8.7 inches) |
| ABS | - | Optional |
| Dimensions & weight | ||
| Wheelbase | 1390 mm (54.7 inches) | 1405 mm (55.3 inches) |
| Overall Length | 2050 mm (80.7 inches) | 2065 mm (81.3 inches) |
| Overall Width | 774 mm (30.5 inches) | 714 mm (28.1 inches) |
| Overall Height | 1150 mm (45.3 inches) | 1123 mm (44.2 inches) |
| Seat Height | ✓810 mm (31.9 inches) | 833 mm (32.8 inches) |
| Dry weight | 187.0 kg (412.3 pounds) | ✓179.6 kg (395.9 pounds) |
| Wet Weight | ✓194.0 kg (427.7 pounds) | 196.0 kg (432.1 pounds) |
| Fuel Capacity | ✓19.50 litres (5.15 US gallons) | 16.30 litres (4.31 US gallons) |
| Oil capacity | 3.80 litres (4.02 US quarts) | 3.30 litres (3.49 US quarts) |
"Best" (✓) reflects that single spec only, not overall suitability - a bike can win on paper and still be the wrong choice for you. Ties are all marked; specs with no clear better/worse direction (e.g. displacement, wheel size) are never marked, only tinted where bikes differ.
Affiliate links - we may earn a commission from qualifying eBay purchases made through these links.
About this comparison tool
This tool puts up to four motorcycles side by side across their full specification sheets, drawn from a database of 43,000+ models and 1.60M+ individual specifications. Wherever a spec has a clear "better" direction - more power, less weight - the strongest figure in that row is highlighted automatically.
How to use it
Pick a make, model and year for each bike; the model and year lists update to match what you've selected. Two bikes are enough - use "Add another bike" for a third or fourth. Comparisons work across model years too, so you can compare a bike against its own earlier generation. Once you're happy with the lineup, use "Copy share link" to send it to someone else.
What gets compared
Specs are pulled from the same categories used throughout the site: engine and transmission (capacity, power, torque, gearbox), physical measures (weight, seat height, fuel and tank capacity), frame and dimensions, speed and acceleration, and brakes, suspension, frame and wheels (including tyres) - plus general information and maintenance data where it's on record for a bike.
How the highlighting works, and its limits
A highlighted cell means one bike has the clearly better raw number for that spec - more power, less weight, and so on. Fields where "better" genuinely depends on the rider - seat height above all - are deliberately never highlighted: a lower seat isn't automatically the right choice, it's a fit question only you can answer. Winning a row also isn't the same as winning the comparison - a bike can lead on paper in half the rows and still be the wrong bike for you.
Frequently asked questions
Can I compare bikes from different categories, like a scooter against a superbike?
Yes - the tool doesn't restrict what you compare, though a highlighted spec means less when the two bikes aren't really doing the same job.
What happens if a spec is missing for one of the bikes?
It shows as "-" and is never highlighted as a winner - a missing figure never beats one that's actually reported, and never blocks the rest of the row.
Are older model years included?
Yes - each bike's year list covers every model year in the database, so you can compare this year's bike against an earlier generation of the same model.
How do I share a comparison?
Every comparison has its own stable URL - use "Copy share link", or just copy the address bar. The same bikes in the same order always produce the same link.