2026 Beta Alp 4.0 vs 2026 Honda CRF300LS - Spec Comparison
Choose up to 4 bikes to compare
2026 Beta Alp 4.0
The 2026 Beta Alp 4.0 is a lightweight adventure bike designed for riders seeking accessible off-road capability and nimble handling. Its compact dimensions, low 35.8-inch seat height, and 12.6-inch ground clearance make it ideal for beginners and shorter riders tackling trails and mixed terrain. Powered by a responsive 4-stroke single-cylinder engine with EFI, it balances efficiency with genuine adventure bike character.
2026 Honda CRF300LS
The 2026 Honda CRF300LS is a lightweight adventure bike designed for novice to intermediate riders seeking accessible off-road capability and reliability. Its 286cc single-cylinder engine delivers manageable power with excellent fuel efficiency, making it ideal for trail exploration and commuting. Known for its upright ergonomics, nimble handling, and Honda's proven durability, the CRF300LS excels as an affordable entry point into adventure motorcycling.
2026 Beta Alp 4.0 vs 2026 Honda CRF300LS: the key differences
Both are dual-sports, so this is a like-for-like choice.
- The 2026 Beta Alp 4.0 makes 8 hp more (35 vs 27 hp).
- The 2026 Beta Alp 4.0 has 6.4 Nm more torque (33 vs 26.6 Nm).
- The 2026 Honda CRF300LS has a 34 mm lower seat (831 vs 865 mm), which helps shorter riders.
- The 2026 Beta Alp 4.0 carries 3 litres more fuel (11 vs 8 L).
2026 Beta Alp 4.0: Designed primarily for trail riding and dual-sport exploration rather than outright speed or highway cruising.
2026 Honda CRF300LS: Built primarily for trail exploration, green-laning, and light dual-sport adventures rather than outright speed or long-distance touring.
Verdict: Choose the 2026 Beta Alp 4.0 if you want more power, more torque and a bigger tank. Choose the 2026 Honda CRF300LS if you want a lower seat. Check the full table below for every figure, and the size comparison for fit.
| Specification | 2026 Beta Alp 4.0 | 2026 Honda CRF300LS |
|---|---|---|
| Other | ||
| Category | Dual-sport | Dual-sport |
| Fuel Tank Material | Plastic | Metal |
| Color Options | - | Swift Gray |
| Comments | - | Model ID: CRF300LDA. |
| Engine | ||
| Capacity: | 348.0 ccm (21.24 cubic inches) | 286.0 ccm (17.45 cubic inches) |
| CO2 Emissions | ✓107 CO2 g/km | ✓72 CO2 g/km |
| EPA Est. Fuel Consumption | 4.57 L/100km (51.5 US mpg) | 3.07 L/100km (76.6 US mpg) |
| EPA CO Emissions | 5.0 CO g/km | 1.1 CO g/km |
| Engine Type | Single, four-stroke | Single, four-stroke |
| Bore x Stroke | 84.5 x 62.0 mm (3.3 x 2.4 inches) | 76.0 x 63.0 mm (3.0 x 2.5 inches) |
| Compression | 12.1:1 | 10.7:1 |
| Cooling System | Liquid | Liquid |
| Fuel System | Injection | Injection |
| Starting | Electric | Electric |
| Ignition | Electronic | Computer-controlled digital transistorized with electronic advance |
| Aspiration | Naturally aspirated | Naturally aspirated |
| Valves Per Cylinder | 4 | 4 |
| Lubrication System | Pressurized oil via pump | - |
| EPA Certificate No. | - | THNXC0.29CFF-021 |
| Fuel Consumption | - | 3.10 litres/100 km (32.3 km/l or 75.88 mpg) |
| Performance | ||
| Power | ✓35.0 HP (26.1 kW) | 27.0 HP (19.9 kW) @ 8500 RPM |
| Torque | ✓33.0 Nm (3.4 kgf-m or 24.3 ft.lbs) @ 7500 RPM | 26.6 Nm (2.7 kgf-m or 19.6 ft.lbs) @ 6500 RPM |
| Power/Weight Ratio | 0.2500 HP/kg (dry) | 0.1914 HP/kg (wet) |
| Chassis & suspension | ||
| Frame | Steel, Perimeter style | Steel semi-double cradle |
| Front Suspension | 45 mm Conventional | 43mm inverted fork |
| Rear Suspension | Single shock with preload adjustment | Pro-Link® single shock with adjustable spring preload |
| Ground Clearance | 320 mm (12.6 inches) | 244 mm (9.6 inches) |
| Front Wheel Travel | - | 236 mm (9.3 inches) |
| Rear Wheel Travel | - | 229 mm (9.0 inches) |
| Rake (fork angle) | - | 27.5° |
| Trail | - | 109 mm (4.3 inches) |
| Transmission | ||
| Gearbox | 6-speed | 6-speed |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Final Drive | Chain | Chain |
| Clutch | Wet multi-disc | Wet multiplate, assist/slipper clutch |
| Dimensions & weight | ||
| Wheelbase | 1440 mm (56.7 inches) | 1455 mm (57.3 inches) |
| Overall Length | 2200 mm (86.6 inches) | - |
| Overall Width | 820 mm (32.3 inches) | - |
| Overall Height | 1220 mm (48.0 inches) | - |
| Seat Height | 865 mm (34.1 inches) | ✓831 mm (32.7 inches) |
| Dry weight | 140.0 kg (308.6 pounds) | - |
| Fuel Capacity | ✓11.00 litres (2.91 US gallons) | 8.00 litres (2.11 US gallons) |
| Wet Weight | - | 141.1 kg (311.1 pounds) |
| Oil capacity | - | 1.80 litres (1.90 US quarts) |
| Reserve fuel capacity | - | 1.90 litres (0.50 US gallons) |
| Brakes & wheels | ||
| Rear Brakes Diameter | 220 mm (8.7 inches) | - |
| Front Tyre | 21 in (Adventure Knobby) | 80/100-21 |
| Front Brakes | - | Single disc. Two-piston calipers. Optional ABS. |
| Front Brakes Diameter | - | 256 mm (10.1 inches) |
| Rear Brakes | - | Single disc. Optional ABS. |
| ABS | - | Optional |
| Rear Tyre | - | 120/80-18 |
"Best" (✓) reflects that single spec only, not overall suitability - a bike can win on paper and still be the wrong choice for you. Ties are all marked; specs with no clear better/worse direction (e.g. displacement, wheel size) are never marked, only tinted where bikes differ.
Affiliate links - we may earn a commission from qualifying eBay purchases made through these links.
About this comparison tool
This tool puts up to four motorcycles side by side across their full specification sheets, drawn from a database of 43,000+ models and 1.60M+ individual specifications. Wherever a spec has a clear "better" direction - more power, less weight - the strongest figure in that row is highlighted automatically.
How to use it
Pick a make, model and year for each bike; the model and year lists update to match what you've selected. Two bikes are enough - use "Add another bike" for a third or fourth. Comparisons work across model years too, so you can compare a bike against its own earlier generation. Once you're happy with the lineup, use "Copy share link" to send it to someone else.
What gets compared
Specs are pulled from the same categories used throughout the site: engine and transmission (capacity, power, torque, gearbox), physical measures (weight, seat height, fuel and tank capacity), frame and dimensions, speed and acceleration, and brakes, suspension, frame and wheels (including tyres) - plus general information and maintenance data where it's on record for a bike.
How the highlighting works, and its limits
A highlighted cell means one bike has the clearly better raw number for that spec - more power, less weight, and so on. Fields where "better" genuinely depends on the rider - seat height above all - are deliberately never highlighted: a lower seat isn't automatically the right choice, it's a fit question only you can answer. Winning a row also isn't the same as winning the comparison - a bike can lead on paper in half the rows and still be the wrong bike for you.
Frequently asked questions
Can I compare bikes from different categories, like a scooter against a superbike?
Yes - the tool doesn't restrict what you compare, though a highlighted spec means less when the two bikes aren't really doing the same job.
What happens if a spec is missing for one of the bikes?
It shows as "-" and is never highlighted as a winner - a missing figure never beats one that's actually reported, and never blocks the rest of the row.
Are older model years included?
Yes - each bike's year list covers every model year in the database, so you can compare this year's bike against an earlier generation of the same model.
How do I share a comparison?
Every comparison has its own stable URL - use "Copy share link", or just copy the address bar. The same bikes in the same order always produce the same link.