The 2026 Suzuki Burgman 400 is a mid-sized maxi-scooter ideal for commuters and touring riders seeking comfort and practicality. Powered by a 400cc fuel-injected engine with automatic CVT transmission, it delivers smooth, effortless urban and highway performance. Known for its spacious ergonomics, integrated storage, and reliable engineering, the Burgman excels as an alternative to traditional motorcycles for daily riding and longer journeys.
The BMW C 400 X is a practical maxi-scooter designed for commuters and casual riders seeking comfort and reliability in urban environments. Powered by a 350cc single-cylinder engine delivering 34 horsepower, it combines fuel efficiency with adequate performance for city riding and short highway trips. Known for its stable handling, weather protection, and BMW's renowned build quality, it appeals to riders prioritizing convenience over sportiness.
Both are scooters, so this is a like-for-like choice.
2026 Suzuki Burgman 400: Designed primarily as a maxi-scooter for commuting and comfortable urban-to-highway travel rather than performance riding.
2026 BMW C400X: Designed primarily as a nimble, comfortable urban commuter that can also handle occasional short highway hops.
Verdict: Choose the 2026 Suzuki Burgman 400 if you want a lower seat. Choose the 2026 BMW C400X if you want lighter weight. Check the full table below for every figure, and the size comparison for fit.
| Specification | 2026 Suzuki Burgman 400 | 2026 BMW C400X |
|---|---|---|
| Other | ||
| Category | Scooter | Scooter |
| Color Options | - | Blackstorm Metallic, Kalamata metallic matt |
| Comments | - | Automatic Stability Control |
| Engine | ||
| Capacity: | 400.0 ccm (24.41 cubic inches) | 350.0 ccm (21.36 cubic inches) |
| Engine Type | Single, four-stroke | Single, four-stroke |
| Bore x Stroke | 81.0 x 77.6 mm (3.2 x 3.1 inches) | 80.0 x 69.5 mm (3.1 x 2.7 inches) |
| Compression | 10.6:1 | 11.5:1 |
| Fuel System | Injection | Injection |
| Starting | Electric | Electric |
| Ignition | Electronics | BMS-E2 digital engine management |
| Lubrication System | Wet sump | Wet sump |
| Fuel Consumption | - | 3.50 litres/100 km (28.6 km/l or 67.20 mpg) |
| Cooling System | - | Liquid |
| Valves Per Cylinder | - | 4 |
| Performance | ||
| Power | 32.8 HP (24.1 kW) | ✓34.0 HP (24.8 kW) @ 7500 RPM |
| Torque | ✓35.2 Nm (3.6 kgf-m or 26.0 ft.lbs) @ 4900 RPM | 35.0 Nm (3.6 kgf-m or 25.8 ft.lbs) @ 5750 RPM |
| Power/Weight Ratio | 0.1505 HP/kg (wet) | 0.1726 HP/kg (dry) |
| Top Speed | - | 129.0 km/h (80.2 mph) |
| Brakes & wheels | ||
| Front Brakes | Twin Disc brake | Single disc. 4-piston calipers. ABS. |
| Rear Brakes | Disc brake | Single disc. 1-piston calipers. ABS. |
| ABS | Yes | Yes |
| Front Brakes Diameter | - | 265 mm (10.4 inches) |
| Front Tyre | - | 120/70-ZR15 |
| Rear Tyre | - | 120/70-ZR14 |
| Dimensions & weight | ||
| Wheelbase | 1580 mm (62.2 inches) | 1560 mm (61.4 inches) |
| Overall Length | 2235 mm (88.0 inches) | 2200 mm (86.6 inches) |
| Overall Width | 765 mm (30.1 inches) | 837 mm (33.0 inches) |
| Overall Height | 1350 mm (53.1 inches) | 1327 mm (52.2 inches) |
| Seat Height | ✓755 mm (29.7 inches) | 775 mm (30.5 inches) |
| Wet Weight | 218.0 kg (480.6 pounds) | ✓208.0 kg (458.6 pounds) |
| Dry weight | - | 197.0 kg (434.3 pounds) |
| Fuel Capacity | - | 12.80 litres (3.38 US gallons) |
| Reserve fuel capacity | - | 4.00 litres (1.06 US gallons) |
| Transmission | ||
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Clutch | Automatic, centrifugal | Centrifugal dry clutch |
| Final Drive | - | Chain |
| Chassis & suspension | ||
| Front Suspension | Telescopic, coil spring, oil damped | Telescopic front fork, Ø 35 mm |
| Rear Suspension | Link type, coil spring, oil damped | Double aluminum swingarm, double springs struts, adjustable preload |
| Ground Clearance | 125 mm (4.9 inches) | - |
| Frame | - | Steel bridge-type frame |
| Front Wheel Travel | - | 110 mm (4.3 inches) |
| Rear Wheel Travel | - | 112 mm (4.4 inches) |
| Rake (fork angle) | - | 26.4° |
| Trail | - | 81 mm (3.2 inches) |
"Best" (✓) reflects that single spec only, not overall suitability - a bike can win on paper and still be the wrong choice for you. Ties are all marked; specs with no clear better/worse direction (e.g. displacement, wheel size) are never marked, only tinted where bikes differ.
Affiliate links - we may earn a commission from qualifying eBay purchases made through these links.
This tool puts up to four motorcycles side by side across their full specification sheets, drawn from a database of 43,000+ models and 1.60M+ individual specifications. Wherever a spec has a clear "better" direction - more power, less weight - the strongest figure in that row is highlighted automatically.
Pick a make, model and year for each bike; the model and year lists update to match what you've selected. Two bikes are enough - use "Add another bike" for a third or fourth. Comparisons work across model years too, so you can compare a bike against its own earlier generation. Once you're happy with the lineup, use "Copy share link" to send it to someone else.
Specs are pulled from the same categories used throughout the site: engine and transmission (capacity, power, torque, gearbox), physical measures (weight, seat height, fuel and tank capacity), frame and dimensions, speed and acceleration, and brakes, suspension, frame and wheels (including tyres) - plus general information and maintenance data where it's on record for a bike.
A highlighted cell means one bike has the clearly better raw number for that spec - more power, less weight, and so on. Fields where "better" genuinely depends on the rider - seat height above all - are deliberately never highlighted: a lower seat isn't automatically the right choice, it's a fit question only you can answer. Winning a row also isn't the same as winning the comparison - a bike can lead on paper in half the rows and still be the wrong bike for you.
Yes - the tool doesn't restrict what you compare, though a highlighted spec means less when the two bikes aren't really doing the same job.
It shows as "-" and is never highlighted as a winner - a missing figure never beats one that's actually reported, and never blocks the rest of the row.
Yes - each bike's year list covers every model year in the database, so you can compare this year's bike against an earlier generation of the same model.
Every comparison has its own stable URL - use "Copy share link", or just copy the address bar. The same bikes in the same order always produce the same link.