The 2026 Aprilia Tuono V4 Factory is a premium naked bike engineered for experienced riders seeking track-ready performance on public roads. Its 1099cc V4 engine delivers aggressive power and handling dynamics, while advanced electronics and premium suspension make it ideal for spirited riding and weekend track days.
The 2026 Yamaha MT-10 is an aggressive naked bike designed for experienced riders seeking thrilling performance and handling. Its 998cc crossplane engine delivers 165.9 horsepower and sharp torque characteristics, making it ideal for sport-oriented street riding and track days. Known for its razor-sharp agility and raw power delivery, the MT-10 commands respect as one of the most capable middleweight naked bikes available.
Both are naked bikes, so this is a like-for-like choice.
2026 Aprilia Tuono V4 Factory: Built for aggressive canyon carving, trackdays, and thrilling backroad blasts where its race-bred chassis and engine can be fully exploited.
2026 Yamaha MT-10: Built primarily for aggressive road riding and canyon carving, blending litre-class engine performance with naked-bike ergonomics.
Verdict: Choose the 2026 Aprilia Tuono V4 Factory if you want more power and lighter weight. Check the full table below for every figure, and the size comparison for fit.
| Specification | 2026 Aprilia Tuono V4 Factory | 2026 Yamaha MT-10 |
|---|---|---|
| Other | ||
| Category | Naked | Naked |
| Fuel Tank Material | Plastic | - |
| Color Options | - | Ice Storm |
| Engine | ||
| Capacity: | 1099.0 ccm (67.07 cubic inches) | 998.0 ccm (60.90 cubic inches) |
| CO2 Emissions | 199 CO2 g/km | - |
| EPA Certificate No. | TPVMC1.09XRU-005 | - |
| EPA Est. Fuel Consumption | 8.46 L/100km (27.8 US mpg) | - |
| EPA CO Emissions | 5.4 CO g/km | - |
| Engine Type | V four, four-stroke | In-line four, four-stroke |
| Bore x Stroke | 81.0 x 52.3 mm (3.2 x 2.1 inches) | 79.0 x 50.9 mm (3.1 x 2.0 inches) |
| Compression | 13.6:1 | 12.0:1 |
| Cooling System | Liquid | Liquid |
| Fuel System | Injection | Injection |
| Starting | Electric | Electric |
| Aspiration | Naturally aspirated | - |
| Valves Per Cylinder | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel Consumption | - | 6.80 litres/100 km (14.7 km/l or 34.59 mpg) |
| Ignition | - | TCI |
| Lubrication System | - | Wet sump |
| Performance | ||
| Power | ✓177.5 HP (132.4 kW) @ 11800 RPM | 165.9 HP (121.1 kW) @ 11500 RPM |
| Torque | ✓121.0 Nm (12.3 kgf-m or 89.2 ft.lbs) @ 9600 RPM | 112.0 Nm (11.4 kgf-m or 82.6 ft.lbs) @ 9000 RPM |
| Power/Weight Ratio | 0.9595 HP/kg (dry) | 0.7825 HP/kg (wet) |
| 0-60 mph | 3.10 seconds | 3.10 seconds |
| 0-100 km/h (0-62 mph) | 3.20 seconds | 3.20 seconds |
| Chassis & suspension | ||
| Frame | Adjustable twin spar aluminum frame w/ pressed and cast sheet elements | Diamond |
| Front Suspension | Öhlins 43mm electronically controlled fork, fully adjustable | 43mm KYB® inverted fork, fully adjustable |
| Rear Suspension | Öhlins electronically controlled monoshock, fully adjustable | KYB® piggyback shock, fully adjustable |
| Front Wheel Travel | 125 mm (4.9 inches) | 119 mm (4.7 inches) |
| Rear Wheel Travel | 114 mm (4.5 inches) | 119 mm (4.7 inches) |
| Rake (fork angle) | - | 24.0° |
| Trail | - | 102 mm (4.0 inches) |
| Ground Clearance | - | 135 mm (5.3 inches) |
| Transmission | ||
| Gearbox | 6-speed | 6-speed |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Final Drive | Chain | Chain |
| Clutch | Multiplate wet clutch with mechanical slipper system. | Multiplate assist and slipper clutch |
| Brakes & wheels | ||
| Front Brakes | Dual 330mm floating discs, Brembo Hypure radial-mount monoblock calipers, cornering ABS | Double disc. ABS. Hydraulic. 4-piston. |
| Rear Brakes | Single 220mm disc; Brembo caliper w/ two 32mm separate pistons, cornering ABS | Single disc. ABS. Hydraulic. |
| ABS | Yes | Yes |
| Front Tyre | 120/70 ZR17 in. | 120/70-ZR17 |
| Rear Tyre | 200/55 ZR17 in. | 190/55-ZR17 |
| Dimensions & weight | ||
| Wheelbase | 1435 mm (56.5 inches) | 1405 mm (55.3 inches) |
| Seat Height | 836 mm (32.9 inches) | ✓835 mm (32.9 inches) |
| Dry weight | 185.0 kg (407.9 pounds) | - |
| Wet Weight | ✓203.7 kg (449.1 pounds) | 212.0 kg (467.4 pounds) |
| Fuel Capacity | ✓18.00 litres (4.76 US gallons) | 17.00 litres (4.49 US gallons) |
| Overall Length | - | 2100 mm (82.7 inches) |
| Overall Width | - | 800 mm (31.5 inches) |
| Overall Height | - | 1165 mm (45.9 inches) |
| Oil capacity | - | 4.90 litres (5.18 US quarts) |
"Best" (✓) reflects that single spec only, not overall suitability - a bike can win on paper and still be the wrong choice for you. Ties are all marked; specs with no clear better/worse direction (e.g. displacement, wheel size) are never marked, only tinted where bikes differ.
Affiliate links - we may earn a commission from qualifying eBay purchases made through these links.
This tool puts up to four motorcycles side by side across their full specification sheets, drawn from a database of 43,000+ models and 1.60M+ individual specifications. Wherever a spec has a clear "better" direction - more power, less weight - the strongest figure in that row is highlighted automatically.
Pick a make, model and year for each bike; the model and year lists update to match what you've selected. Two bikes are enough - use "Add another bike" for a third or fourth. Comparisons work across model years too, so you can compare a bike against its own earlier generation. Once you're happy with the lineup, use "Copy share link" to send it to someone else.
Specs are pulled from the same categories used throughout the site: engine and transmission (capacity, power, torque, gearbox), physical measures (weight, seat height, fuel and tank capacity), frame and dimensions, speed and acceleration, and brakes, suspension, frame and wheels (including tyres) - plus general information and maintenance data where it's on record for a bike.
A highlighted cell means one bike has the clearly better raw number for that spec - more power, less weight, and so on. Fields where "better" genuinely depends on the rider - seat height above all - are deliberately never highlighted: a lower seat isn't automatically the right choice, it's a fit question only you can answer. Winning a row also isn't the same as winning the comparison - a bike can lead on paper in half the rows and still be the wrong bike for you.
Yes - the tool doesn't restrict what you compare, though a highlighted spec means less when the two bikes aren't really doing the same job.
It shows as "-" and is never highlighted as a winner - a missing figure never beats one that's actually reported, and never blocks the rest of the row.
Yes - each bike's year list covers every model year in the database, so you can compare this year's bike against an earlier generation of the same model.
Every comparison has its own stable URL - use "Copy share link", or just copy the address bar. The same bikes in the same order always produce the same link.