2026 KTM 125 Duke vs 2026 Honda CB125F - Spec Comparison
Choose up to 4 bikes to compare
2026 KTM 125 Duke
The 2026 KTM 125 Duke is an entry-level naked bike designed for new and young riders seeking an agile, lightweight platform. Powered by a 124.99cc single-cylinder engine producing 15 PS, it combines responsive handling with modern styling. Known for its playful character and accessible performance, the Duke 125 excels as an affordable gateway into premium motorcycling with quality suspension and braking components.
2026 Honda CB125F
The 2026 Honda CB 125F is an entry-level commuter motorcycle ideal for new riders and urban commuters seeking reliable, fuel-efficient daily transportation. Its lightweight 117 kg frame, accessible 790 mm seat height, and nimble handling make it perfect for navigating city traffic and learning fundamental riding skills. Known for Honda's legendary dependability and low maintenance costs, the CB 125F excels as an affordable, practical first motorcycle.
2026 KTM 125 Duke vs 2026 Honda CB125F: the key differences
Both are naked bikes, so this is a like-for-like choice.
- The 2026 KTM 125 Duke makes 4.1 hp more (14.8 vs 10.7 hp).
- The 2026 Honda CB125F is 37 kg lighter (117 vs 154 kg).
- The 2026 KTM 125 Duke carries 2.4 litres more fuel (13.4 vs 11 L).
2026 KTM 125 Duke: A nimble entry-level naked built for city commuting, learning throttle and cornering skills, and fun back-road blasts.
2026 Honda CB125F: Built for low-cost, fuel-efficient urban commuting rather than performance or adventure riding.
Verdict: Choose the 2026 KTM 125 Duke if you want more power and a bigger tank. Choose the 2026 Honda CB125F if you want lighter weight. Check the full table below for every figure, and the size comparison for fit.
| Specification | 2026 KTM 125 Duke | 2026 Honda CB125F |
|---|---|---|
| Other | ||
| Category | Naked | Naked |
| Rake | - | 26 ° |
| Engine | ||
| Capacity: | 125.0 ccm (7.63 cubic inches) | 123.9 ccm (7.56 cubic inches) |
| Engine Type | Single, four-stroke | Single, four-stroke |
| Bore x Stroke | 58.0 x 47.2 mm (2.3 x 1.9 inches) | 50.0 x 63.1 mm (2.0 x 2.5 inches) |
| Cooling System | Liquid | Air |
| Fuel System | Injection | Injection |
| Starting | Electric | Electric |
| Ignition | Contactless, controlled, fully electronic ignition system with digital ignition timing adjustment, type Kokusan | CDI |
| Valves Per Cylinder | 4 | 2 |
| Lubrication System | Wet sump | - |
| Compression | - | 10.0:1 |
| Performance | ||
| Power | ✓14.8 HP (11.0 kW) | 10.7 HP (7.9 kW) @ 7500 RPM |
| Torque | ✓11.5 Nm (1.2 kgf-m or 8.5 ft.lbs) @ 8000 RPM | 10.9 Nm (1.1 kgf-m or 8.0 ft.lbs) @ 6000 RPM |
| Power/Weight Ratio | 0.1156 HP/kg (dry) | 0.0915 HP/kg (wet) |
| Chassis & suspension | ||
| Frame | Steel trellis frame, powder coated | Steel diamond |
| Front Suspension | WP APEX 43 | 30mm Telescopic fork, non-adjustable fork |
| Rear Suspension | WP Apex Monoshock | Dual rear shocks with 5-step spring preload adjustment |
| Front Wheel Travel | 150 mm (5.9 inches) | 118 mm (4.6 inches) |
| Rear Wheel Travel | 150 mm (5.9 inches) | 70 mm (2.8 inches) |
| Rake (fork angle) | 25.0° | 26.0° |
| Trail | 100 mm (3.9 inches) | 92 mm (3.6 inches) |
| Ground Clearance | 175 mm (6.9 inches) | 160 mm (6.3 inches) |
| Transmission | ||
| Gearbox | 6-speed | 5-speed |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Final Drive | Chain | Chain |
| Clutch | Wet multi-disc clutch, mechanically actuated | Wet, multiplate with coil springs |
| Brakes & wheels | ||
| Front Brakes | Four-piston radial fixed calliper, brake disc | Single 240mm disc 1 piston caliper |
| Front Brakes Diameter | 320 mm (12.6 inches) | 240 mm (9.4 inches) |
| Rear Brakes | Single-piston floating calliper | 130mm Drum |
| Rear Brakes Diameter | 240 mm (9.4 inches) | 130 mm (5.1 inches) |
| Front Tyre | 110-17 | 80/100 –18M/C 47P |
| Rear Tyre | 150-17 | 100/80 –18M/C 53P |
| Front Wheel | - | 18.0 in |
| Rear Wheel | - | 18.0 in |
| Dimensions & weight | ||
| Wheelbase | 1357 mm (53.4 inches) | 1285 mm (50.6 inches) |
| Seat Height | 800 mm (31.5 inches) | ✓790 mm (31.1 inches) |
| Dry weight | 128.0 kg (282.2 pounds) | - |
| Wet Weight | 154.0 kg (339.5 pounds) | ✓117.0 kg (257.9 pounds) |
| Fuel Capacity | ✓13.40 litres (3.54 US gallons) | 11.00 litres (2.91 US gallons) |
| Overall Length | - | 2015 mm (79.3 inches) |
| Overall Width | - | 750 mm (29.5 inches) |
| Overall Height | - | 1100 mm (43.3 inches) |
| Oil capacity | - | 1.00 litres (1.06 US quarts) |
"Best" (✓) reflects that single spec only, not overall suitability - a bike can win on paper and still be the wrong choice for you. Ties are all marked; specs with no clear better/worse direction (e.g. displacement, wheel size) are never marked, only tinted where bikes differ.
Affiliate links - we may earn a commission from qualifying eBay purchases made through these links.
About this comparison tool
This tool puts up to four motorcycles side by side across their full specification sheets, drawn from a database of 43,000+ models and 1.60M+ individual specifications. Wherever a spec has a clear "better" direction - more power, less weight - the strongest figure in that row is highlighted automatically.
How to use it
Pick a make, model and year for each bike; the model and year lists update to match what you've selected. Two bikes are enough - use "Add another bike" for a third or fourth. Comparisons work across model years too, so you can compare a bike against its own earlier generation. Once you're happy with the lineup, use "Copy share link" to send it to someone else.
What gets compared
Specs are pulled from the same categories used throughout the site: engine and transmission (capacity, power, torque, gearbox), physical measures (weight, seat height, fuel and tank capacity), frame and dimensions, speed and acceleration, and brakes, suspension, frame and wheels (including tyres) - plus general information and maintenance data where it's on record for a bike.
How the highlighting works, and its limits
A highlighted cell means one bike has the clearly better raw number for that spec - more power, less weight, and so on. Fields where "better" genuinely depends on the rider - seat height above all - are deliberately never highlighted: a lower seat isn't automatically the right choice, it's a fit question only you can answer. Winning a row also isn't the same as winning the comparison - a bike can lead on paper in half the rows and still be the wrong bike for you.
Frequently asked questions
Can I compare bikes from different categories, like a scooter against a superbike?
Yes - the tool doesn't restrict what you compare, though a highlighted spec means less when the two bikes aren't really doing the same job.
What happens if a spec is missing for one of the bikes?
It shows as "-" and is never highlighted as a winner - a missing figure never beats one that's actually reported, and never blocks the rest of the row.
Are older model years included?
Yes - each bike's year list covers every model year in the database, so you can compare this year's bike against an earlier generation of the same model.
How do I share a comparison?
Every comparison has its own stable URL - use "Copy share link", or just copy the address bar. The same bikes in the same order always produce the same link.