2026 KTM 250 Duke vs 2026 Benelli 302S - Spec Comparison
Choose up to 4 bikes to compare
2026 KTM 250 Duke
The 2026 KTM 250 Duke is a lightweight, agile naked bike designed for beginner to intermediate riders seeking an accessible entry into street riding. Its sharp handling and nimble character, powered by a liquid-cooled 249cc single-cylinder engine delivering 31 PS, make it ideal for urban commuting and spirited riding on twisty roads. Known for its aggressive styling and responsive performance, the Duke 250 offers genuine fun without overwhelming inexperienced riders.
2026 Benelli 302S
The 2026 Benelli 302S is an approachable naked bike aimed at newer riders and urban commuters stepping up from smaller machines. Its 300 cc parallel twin delivers 32.2 hp with a smooth, rev-happy character, while the low 795 mm seat height and steel trellis frame keep it easy to manage. Best known for offering twin-cylinder refinement and big-bike presence at entry level.
2026 KTM 250 Duke vs 2026 Benelli 302S: the key differences
Both are naked bikes, so this is a like-for-like choice.
- The 2026 KTM 250 Duke is 30 kg lighter (165 vs 195 kg).
- The 2026 Benelli 302S carries 2.6 litres more fuel (13.4 vs 16 L).
2026 KTM 250 Duke: Built primarily as a nimble city and commuter bike that also enjoys a spirited weekend ride through twisty roads.
2026 Benelli 302S: Built primarily as an affordable, easy-going naked bike for commuting and everyday urban riding.
Verdict: Choose the 2026 KTM 250 Duke if you want lighter weight. Choose the 2026 Benelli 302S if you want a bigger tank. Check the full table below for every figure, and the size comparison for fit.
| Specification | 2026 KTM 250 Duke | 2026 Benelli 302S |
|---|---|---|
| Other | ||
| Category | Naked | Naked |
| Color Options | - | Red, Black, Yellow, Black/ Red |
| Fuel Tank Material | - | Metal |
| Engine | ||
| Capacity: | 249.0 ccm (15.19 cubic inches) | 300.0 ccm (18.31 cubic inches) |
| CO2 Emissions | ✓67 CO2 g/km | ✓104 CO2 g/km |
| EPA Certificate No. | TKTXC.249DKE-015 | TQJNC0.30MCA-003-R01 |
| EPA Est. Fuel Consumption | 2.83 L/100km (83.1 US mpg) | 4.44 L/100km (53.0 US mpg) |
| EPA CO Emissions | 0.1 CO g/km | 2.7 CO g/km |
| Engine Type | Single, four-stroke | Parallel Twin, four-stroke |
| Bore x Stroke | 72.0 x 61.1 mm (2.8 x 2.4 inches) | 65.0 x 45.2 mm (2.6 x 1.8 inches) |
| Cooling System | Liquid | Liquid |
| Fuel System | Injection | Injection |
| Starting | Electric | Electric |
| Ignition | Bosch EMS | TCI |
| Aspiration | Naturally aspirated | Naturally aspirated |
| Valves Per Cylinder | 4 | 4 |
| Lubrication System | Wet sump | Pressure splash |
| Compression | - | 12.0:1 |
| Performance | ||
| Power | 30.8 HP (23.0 kW) @ 9500 RPM | ✓32.2 HP (24.0 kW) @ 10500 RPM |
| Torque | 25.0 Nm (2.5 kgf-m or 18.4 ft.lbs) | ✓25.6 Nm (2.6 kgf-m or 18.9 ft.lbs) @ 9750 RPM |
| Power/Weight Ratio | 0.2110 HP/kg (dry) | 0.1651 HP/kg (wet) |
| Top Speed | - | 160.0 km/h (99.4 mph) |
| Chassis & suspension | ||
| Frame | Steel trellis frame, powder coated | Steel trellis |
| Front Suspension | WP APEX 43 | Telescopic |
| Rear Suspension | WP shock absorber with linkage | Mono-shock-absorber, preload adjustable |
| Front Wheel Travel | 150 mm (5.9 inches) | 135 mm (5.3 inches) |
| Rear Wheel Travel | 150 mm (5.9 inches) | 45 mm (1.8 inches) |
| Rake (fork angle) | 26.5° | - |
| Ground Clearance | 185 mm (7.3 inches) | 140 mm (5.5 inches) |
| Transmission | ||
| Gearbox | 6-speed | 6-speed |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Final Drive | Chain | Chain |
| Clutch | Slipper clutch | Wet multi-plate |
| Brakes & wheels | ||
| Front Brakes | Single disc. Brembo ABS | Double disc. 4 pistons caliper |
| Front Brakes Diameter | 300 mm (11.8 inches) | 260 mm (10.2 inches) |
| Rear Brakes | Single-piston floating calliper | Single disc. 2 pistons caliper |
| Rear Brakes Diameter | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | - |
| ABS | Yes | - |
| Front Tyre | 110/80-17 | 120/70-ZR17 |
| Rear Tyre | 150/60-17 | 160/60-ZR17 |
| Dimensions & weight | ||
| Wheelbase | 1357 mm (53.4 inches) | 1410 mm (55.5 inches) |
| Seat Height | 800 mm (31.5 inches) | ✓795 mm (31.3 inches) |
| Dry weight | 146.0 kg (321.9 pounds) | - |
| Wet Weight | ✓165.0 kg (363.8 pounds) | 195.0 kg (429.9 pounds) |
| Fuel Capacity | 13.40 litres (3.54 US gallons) | ✓16.00 litres (4.23 US gallons) |
| Overall Length | - | 2130 mm (83.9 inches) |
| Overall Width | - | 800 mm (31.5 inches) |
| Overall Height | - | 1120 mm (44.1 inches) |
"Best" (✓) reflects that single spec only, not overall suitability - a bike can win on paper and still be the wrong choice for you. Ties are all marked; specs with no clear better/worse direction (e.g. displacement, wheel size) are never marked, only tinted where bikes differ.
Affiliate links - we may earn a commission from qualifying eBay purchases made through these links.
About this comparison tool
This tool puts up to four motorcycles side by side across their full specification sheets, drawn from a database of 43,000+ models and 1.60M+ individual specifications. Wherever a spec has a clear "better" direction - more power, less weight - the strongest figure in that row is highlighted automatically.
How to use it
Pick a make, model and year for each bike; the model and year lists update to match what you've selected. Two bikes are enough - use "Add another bike" for a third or fourth. Comparisons work across model years too, so you can compare a bike against its own earlier generation. Once you're happy with the lineup, use "Copy share link" to send it to someone else.
What gets compared
Specs are pulled from the same categories used throughout the site: engine and transmission (capacity, power, torque, gearbox), physical measures (weight, seat height, fuel and tank capacity), frame and dimensions, speed and acceleration, and brakes, suspension, frame and wheels (including tyres) - plus general information and maintenance data where it's on record for a bike.
How the highlighting works, and its limits
A highlighted cell means one bike has the clearly better raw number for that spec - more power, less weight, and so on. Fields where "better" genuinely depends on the rider - seat height above all - are deliberately never highlighted: a lower seat isn't automatically the right choice, it's a fit question only you can answer. Winning a row also isn't the same as winning the comparison - a bike can lead on paper in half the rows and still be the wrong bike for you.
Frequently asked questions
Can I compare bikes from different categories, like a scooter against a superbike?
Yes - the tool doesn't restrict what you compare, though a highlighted spec means less when the two bikes aren't really doing the same job.
What happens if a spec is missing for one of the bikes?
It shows as "-" and is never highlighted as a winner - a missing figure never beats one that's actually reported, and never blocks the rest of the row.
Are older model years included?
Yes - each bike's year list covers every model year in the database, so you can compare this year's bike against an earlier generation of the same model.
How do I share a comparison?
Every comparison has its own stable URL - use "Copy share link", or just copy the address bar. The same bikes in the same order always produce the same link.