The 2026 KTM 390 Duke is an agile, lightweight naked bike engineered for beginner to intermediate riders seeking thrilling urban performance and weekend adventures. Its punchy 398cc single-cylinder engine delivers 45 PS with responsive handling courtesy of the WP APEX suspension and steel trellis frame, making it an accessible gateway into spirited motorcycling.
The 2026 Yamaha MT-03 is an accessible 321cc naked bike designed for new and intermediate riders seeking an agile, confidence-inspiring platform. Its parallel-twin engine delivers smooth, manageable power with a lightweight frame, making it ideal for urban commuting and spirited weekend riding. Known for its approachable performance and affordability, the MT-03 excels at teaching proper riding fundamentals.
Both are naked bikes, so this is a like-for-like choice.
2026 KTM 390 Duke: Built primarily as a nimble city and canyon-carving streetfighter rather than a long-distance or off-road machine.
2026 Yamaha MT-03: It's designed primarily for commuting, city riding, and learning the fundamentals of naked-sportbike handling and light cornering.
Verdict: Choose the 2026 KTM 390 Duke if you want more power and more torque. Choose the 2026 Yamaha MT-03 if you want a lower seat. Check the full table below for every figure, and the size comparison for fit.
| Specification | 2026 KTM 390 Duke | 2026 Yamaha MT-03 |
|---|---|---|
| Other | ||
| Category | Naked | Naked |
| Color Options | - | Team Yamaha Blue, Ice Storm, Matte Stealth Black |
| Comments | - | LCD meter provides easy-to-absorb information. |
| Engine | ||
| Capacity: | 398.7 ccm (24.33 cubic inches) | 321.0 ccm (19.59 cubic inches) |
| CO2 Emissions | 95 CO2 g/km | - |
| EPA Certificate No. | TKTXC.399FOI-006 | - |
| EPA Est. Fuel Consumption | 4.04 L/100km (58.2 US mpg) | - |
| EPA CO Emissions | 0.4 CO g/km | - |
| Engine Type | Single, four-stroke | Parallel Twin, four-stroke |
| Bore x Stroke | 89.0 x 60.0 mm (3.5 x 2.4 inches) | 68.0 x 44.1 mm (2.7 x 1.7 inches) |
| Cooling System | Liquid | Liquid |
| Fuel System | Injection | Injection |
| Starting | Electric | Electric |
| Aspiration | Naturally aspirated | - |
| Valves Per Cylinder | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel Consumption | - | 4.20 litres/100 km (23.8 km/l or 56.00 mpg) |
| Compression | - | 11.2:1 |
| Ignition | - | TCI |
| Lubrication System | - | Wet sump |
| Performance | ||
| Power | ✓44.4 HP (33.0 kW) @ 8500 RPM | 42.0 HP (30.7 kW) @ 10750 RPM |
| Torque | ✓39.0 Nm (4.0 kgf-m or 28.8 ft.lbs) | 29.6 Nm (3.0 kgf-m or 21.8 ft.lbs) @ 9000 RPM |
| Power/Weight Ratio | 0.2980 HP/kg (dry) | 0.2482 HP/kg (wet) |
| 0-60 mph | - | 5.00 seconds |
| 0-100 km/h (0-62 mph) | - | 5.40 seconds |
| Chassis & suspension | ||
| Frame | Steel trellis frame, powder coated | Diamond Tubular |
| Front Suspension | WP APEX 43 | KYB inverted forks, Ø37.0 mm inner tube |
| Rear Suspension | WP Suspension | Single shock; 7-step preload adjustable |
| Front Wheel Travel | 150 mm (5.9 inches) | 130 mm (5.1 inches) |
| Rear Wheel Travel | 150 mm (5.9 inches) | 125 mm (4.9 inches) |
| Rake (fork angle) | - | 25.0° |
| Trail | - | 95 mm (3.7 inches) |
| Ground Clearance | - | 160 mm (6.3 inches) |
| Transmission | ||
| Gearbox | 6-speed | 6-speed |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Final Drive | Chain | Chain |
| Clutch | Wet multi-disc clutch / mechanically operated | Multiplate wet |
| Brakes & wheels | ||
| Front Brakes | Four-piston radial fixed calliper | Single disc. ABS |
| Front Brakes Diameter | 320 mm (12.6 inches) | 298 mm (11.7 inches) |
| Rear Brakes | Single disc. Brembo. ABS. | Single disc. ABS |
| Rear Brakes Diameter | 240 mm (9.4 inches) | - |
| ABS | Yes | Yes |
| Front Tyre | - | 110/70-R17 |
| Rear Tyre | - | 140/70-R17 |
| Dimensions & weight | ||
| Wheelbase | 1357 mm (53.4 inches) | 1380 mm (54.3 inches) |
| Seat Height | 820 mm (32.3 inches) | ✓780 mm (30.7 inches) |
| Dry weight | 149.0 kg (328.5 pounds) | - |
| Wet Weight | ✓165.0 kg (363.8 pounds) | 169.2 kg (373.0 pounds) |
| Fuel Capacity | 13.40 litres (3.54 US gallons) | ✓14.00 litres (3.70 US gallons) |
| Overall Length | - | 2090 mm (82.3 inches) |
| Overall Width | - | 754 mm (29.7 inches) |
| Overall Height | - | 1069 mm (42.1 inches) |
| Oil capacity | - | 2.40 litres (2.54 US quarts) |
"Best" (✓) reflects that single spec only, not overall suitability - a bike can win on paper and still be the wrong choice for you. Ties are all marked; specs with no clear better/worse direction (e.g. displacement, wheel size) are never marked, only tinted where bikes differ.
Affiliate links - we may earn a commission from qualifying eBay purchases made through these links.
This tool puts up to four motorcycles side by side across their full specification sheets, drawn from a database of 43,000+ models and 1.60M+ individual specifications. Wherever a spec has a clear "better" direction - more power, less weight - the strongest figure in that row is highlighted automatically.
Pick a make, model and year for each bike; the model and year lists update to match what you've selected. Two bikes are enough - use "Add another bike" for a third or fourth. Comparisons work across model years too, so you can compare a bike against its own earlier generation. Once you're happy with the lineup, use "Copy share link" to send it to someone else.
Specs are pulled from the same categories used throughout the site: engine and transmission (capacity, power, torque, gearbox), physical measures (weight, seat height, fuel and tank capacity), frame and dimensions, speed and acceleration, and brakes, suspension, frame and wheels (including tyres) - plus general information and maintenance data where it's on record for a bike.
A highlighted cell means one bike has the clearly better raw number for that spec - more power, less weight, and so on. Fields where "better" genuinely depends on the rider - seat height above all - are deliberately never highlighted: a lower seat isn't automatically the right choice, it's a fit question only you can answer. Winning a row also isn't the same as winning the comparison - a bike can lead on paper in half the rows and still be the wrong bike for you.
Yes - the tool doesn't restrict what you compare, though a highlighted spec means less when the two bikes aren't really doing the same job.
It shows as "-" and is never highlighted as a winner - a missing figure never beats one that's actually reported, and never blocks the rest of the row.
Yes - each bike's year list covers every model year in the database, so you can compare this year's bike against an earlier generation of the same model.
Every comparison has its own stable URL - use "Copy share link", or just copy the address bar. The same bikes in the same order always produce the same link.