2026 Honda XR150L vs 2026 Rieju Aventura 125 - Spec Comparison
Choose up to 4 bikes to compare
2026 Honda XR150L
The 2026 Honda XR150L is an accessible dual-sport designed for beginner and recreational riders seeking adventure-ready capability. Its lightweight 282-pound frame, low 32.8-inch seat, and forgiving ergonomics make it ideal for off-road exploration and commuting. Known for reliability and affordability, it excels on unpaved terrain while remaining street-legal and fuel-efficient.
2026 Rieju Aventura 125
The 2026 Rieju Aventura 125 is a lightweight enduro bike designed for beginner and intermediate off-road riders seeking versatility on mixed terrain. Its liquid-cooled 125cc four-stroke engine delivers manageable power while the upside-down forks and tubular steel frame provide capable handling for trail riding and light adventure use.
2026 Honda XR150L vs 2026 Rieju Aventura 125: the key differences
Both are enduro bikes, so this is a like-for-like choice.
- The 2026 Rieju Aventura 125 makes 2.8 hp more (12 vs 14.8 hp).
- The 2026 Rieju Aventura 125 has a 53 mm lower seat (780 vs 833 mm), which helps shorter riders.
- The 2026 Rieju Aventura 125 carries 3.4 litres more fuel (10.6 vs 14 L).
2026 Honda XR150L: It's built as a light dual-sport for trail exploration, commuting on rough roads, and general utility riding rather than speed or long highway hauls.
2026 Rieju Aventura 125: It is designed as an affordable, versatile commuter-adventurer that can handle city streets, rural roads, and easy off-road tracks rather than high-speed touring or performance riding.
Verdict: Choose the 2026 Rieju Aventura 125 if you want more power, a lower seat and a bigger tank. Check the full table below for every figure, and the size comparison for fit.
| Specification | 2026 Honda XR150L | 2026 Rieju Aventura 125 |
|---|---|---|
| Other | ||
| Category | Enduro | Enduro |
| Color Options | White; Gray | Gray/ Green, Red, Black |
| Fuel Tank Material | Metal | - |
| Rake | 27.0deg | - |
| Comments | - | Windscreen. Spanish brand. |
| Carrying capacity | - | Rear rack, optional top case. |
| Engine | ||
| Capacity: | 149.0 ccm (9.09 cubic inches) | 125.0 ccm (7.63 cubic inches) |
| CO2 Emissions | 44 CO2 g/km | - |
| EPA Certificate No. | THNXC0.15CBA-023 | - |
| EPA Est. Fuel Consumption | 1.87 L/100km (125.8 US mpg) | - |
| EPA CO Emissions | 4.7 CO g/km | - |
| Engine Type | Single, four-stroke | Single, four-stroke |
| Bore x Stroke | 57.3 x 57.8 mm (2.3 x 2.3 inches) | 58.0 x 47.0 mm (2.3 x 1.9 inches) |
| Compression | 9.5:1 | - |
| Cooling System | Air | Liquid |
| Fuel System | Carburettor | Injection |
| Starting | Electric & kick | Electric |
| Aspiration | Naturally aspirated | - |
| Valves Per Cylinder | 2 | 4 |
| Performance | ||
| Power | 12.0 HP (8.8 kW) | ✓14.8 HP (10.8 kW) |
| Torque | 12.5 Nm (1.3 kgf-m or 9.2 ft.lbs) @ 6000 RPM | - |
| Power/Weight Ratio | 0.0938 HP/kg (dry) | 0.1072 HP/kg (dry) |
| Transmission | ||
| Gearbox | 5-speed | 6-speed |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Final Drive | Chain | Chain |
| Brakes & wheels | ||
| Front Brakes | Single hydraulic caliper w/ 240mm disc | Single disc. Double piston caliper. |
| Front Brakes Diameter | 240 mm (9.4 inches) | 260 mm (10.2 inches) |
| Rear Brakes | 110mm drum | Single disc. 2-piston caliper |
| Front Tyre | 90/90-19 | 100/90-18 |
| Rear Tyre | 110/90-17 | 130/80-17 |
| Dimensions & weight | ||
| Wheelbase | 1359 mm (53.5 inches) | 1370 mm (53.9 inches) |
| Overall Length | 2075 mm (81.7 inches) | 2110 mm (83.1 inches) |
| Overall Width | 810 mm (31.9 inches) | 880 mm (34.6 inches) |
| Overall Height | 1130 mm (44.5 inches) | 1330 mm (52.4 inches) |
| Seat Height | 833 mm (32.8 inches) | ✓780 mm (30.7 inches) |
| Dry weight | ✓127.9 kg (282.0 pounds) | 138.0 kg (304.2 pounds) |
| Wet Weight | 127.9 kg (282.0 pounds) | - |
| Fuel Capacity | 10.60 litres (2.80 US gallons) | ✓14.00 litres (3.70 US gallons) |
| Chassis & suspension | ||
| Front Suspension | Telescopic fork | Upside down forks |
| Rear Suspension | Pro-Link® single shock with adjustable spring preload | Progressive Mono-shock |
| Front Wheel Travel | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | - |
| Rear Wheel Travel | 150 mm (5.9 inches) | - |
| Rake (fork angle) | 27.0° | - |
| Trail | 104 mm (4.1 inches) | - |
| Ground Clearance | 244 mm (9.6 inches) | - |
| Frame | - | Tubular steel |
"Best" (✓) reflects that single spec only, not overall suitability - a bike can win on paper and still be the wrong choice for you. Ties are all marked; specs with no clear better/worse direction (e.g. displacement, wheel size) are never marked, only tinted where bikes differ.
Affiliate links - we may earn a commission from qualifying eBay purchases made through these links.
About this comparison tool
This tool puts up to four motorcycles side by side across their full specification sheets, drawn from a database of 43,000+ models and 1.60M+ individual specifications. Wherever a spec has a clear "better" direction - more power, less weight - the strongest figure in that row is highlighted automatically.
How to use it
Pick a make, model and year for each bike; the model and year lists update to match what you've selected. Two bikes are enough - use "Add another bike" for a third or fourth. Comparisons work across model years too, so you can compare a bike against its own earlier generation. Once you're happy with the lineup, use "Copy share link" to send it to someone else.
What gets compared
Specs are pulled from the same categories used throughout the site: engine and transmission (capacity, power, torque, gearbox), physical measures (weight, seat height, fuel and tank capacity), frame and dimensions, speed and acceleration, and brakes, suspension, frame and wheels (including tyres) - plus general information and maintenance data where it's on record for a bike.
How the highlighting works, and its limits
A highlighted cell means one bike has the clearly better raw number for that spec - more power, less weight, and so on. Fields where "better" genuinely depends on the rider - seat height above all - are deliberately never highlighted: a lower seat isn't automatically the right choice, it's a fit question only you can answer. Winning a row also isn't the same as winning the comparison - a bike can lead on paper in half the rows and still be the wrong bike for you.
Frequently asked questions
Can I compare bikes from different categories, like a scooter against a superbike?
Yes - the tool doesn't restrict what you compare, though a highlighted spec means less when the two bikes aren't really doing the same job.
What happens if a spec is missing for one of the bikes?
It shows as "-" and is never highlighted as a winner - a missing figure never beats one that's actually reported, and never blocks the rest of the row.
Are older model years included?
Yes - each bike's year list covers every model year in the database, so you can compare this year's bike against an earlier generation of the same model.
How do I share a comparison?
Every comparison has its own stable URL - use "Copy share link", or just copy the address bar. The same bikes in the same order always produce the same link.