The 2026 Honda CB650R is a middleweight naked bike designed for riders seeking an accessible yet capable all-rounder. Its 649cc inline-four engine delivers smooth power with excellent handling characteristics, while its lightweight frame and forgiving ergonomics make it ideal for both commuting and weekend rides. Known for its blend of reliability, agility, and modern features like ABS and assist-and-slipper clutch, it represents Honda's commitment to affordable performance.
The 2026 Suzuki GSX-8S is a middleweight naked bike designed for riders seeking accessible performance and modern styling. Powered by a 776cc parallel-twin engine with a distinctive 270-degree crankshaft, it delivers smooth power delivery and punchy mid-range torque ideal for both commuting and spirited riding. Known for its approachable ergonomics and refined handling, the GSX-8S bridges the gap between entry-level and experienced riders.
Both are naked bikes, so this is a like-for-like choice.
2026 Honda CB650R: Designed primarily for spirited street riding and weekend canyon carving with an inline-four engine that loves to rev.
2026 Suzuki GSX-8S: Built primarily as a versatile everyday and weekend-fun naked bike that mixes commuting comfort with genuine cornering enthusiasm.
Verdict: Choose the 2026 Honda CB650R if you want more power. Choose the 2026 Suzuki GSX-8S if you want more torque. Check the full table below for every figure, and the size comparison for fit.
| Specification | 2026 Honda CB650R | 2026 Suzuki GSX-8S |
|---|---|---|
| Other | ||
| Category | Naked | Naked |
| Color Options | Matte Black Metallic | Glass Sparkle Black/Pearl Cosmic Blue ), Metallic Matte Black |
| Rake | 25.5º | - |
| Comments | - | Suzuki Intelligent Ride System. |
| Engine | ||
| Capacity: | 649.0 ccm (39.60 cubic inches) | 776.0 ccm (47.35 cubic inches) |
| Engine Type | In-line four, four-stroke | Parallel Twin, four-stroke |
| Bore x Stroke | 67.0 x 46.0 mm (2.6 x 1.8 inches) | 84.0 x 70.0 mm (3.3 x 2.8 inches) |
| Compression | 11.6:1 | 12.8:1 |
| Cooling System | Liquid | Liquid |
| Fuel System | Injection | Injection |
| Starting | Electric | Electric |
| Ignition | Full transistorized | Electronic |
| Valves Per Cylinder | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel Consumption | - | 3.50 litres/100 km (28.6 km/l or 67.20 mpg) |
| Lubrication System | - | Forced feed circulation, wet sump |
| Performance | ||
| Power | ✓93.9 HP (69.1 kW) | 81.8 HP (60.2 kW) |
| Torque | 63.0 Nm (6.4 kgf-m or 46.5 ft.lbs) @ 9500 RPM | ✓78.0 Nm (8.0 kgf-m or 57.5 ft.lbs) |
| Power/Weight Ratio | 0.4541 HP/kg (wet) | 0.4050 HP/kg (wet) |
| 0-60 mph | 3.80 seconds | 3.40 seconds |
| 0-100 km/h (0-62 mph) | 4.10 seconds | 3.80 seconds |
| Chassis & suspension | ||
| Frame | Steel diamond | Steel |
| Front Suspension | 41mm inverted Showa Separate Function Fork Big Piston (SFF-BP); 4.7-inch travel | Inverted telescopic, coil spring, oil damped |
| Rear Suspension | Showa single shock w/ adjustable preload; 5.1-inch travel | Link type, coil spring, oil damped |
| Front Wheel Travel | 108 mm (4.3 inches) | 130 mm (5.1 inches) |
| Rear Wheel Travel | 128 mm (5.0 inches) | 130 mm (5.1 inches) |
| Rake (fork angle) | 25.5° | 25.0° |
| Trail | 101 mm (4.0 inches) | 104 mm (4.1 inches) |
| Ground Clearance | 147 mm (5.8 inches) | 145 mm (5.7 inches) |
| Transmission | ||
| Gearbox | 6-speed | 6-speed |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Final Drive | Chain | Chain |
| Clutch | Wet, multiplate with coil springs | Wet, multi-plate |
| Brakes & wheels | ||
| Front Brakes | Dual four-piston, radial-mount Nissin hydraulic calipers w/ 310mm floating discs; ABS | Double disc. ABS. Nissin, radial-mount 4-piston calipers |
| Front Brakes Diameter | 320 mm (12.6 inches) | - |
| Rear Brakes | Single one-piston hydraulic caliper w/ 240mm disc; ABS | Single disc. ABS. Nissin, 1-piston caliper |
| ABS | Yes | Yes |
| Front Tyre | 120/70-17 | 120/70ZR17M/C (58W) |
| Rear Tyre | 180/55-17 | 180/55ZR17M/C (73W) |
| Dimensions & weight | ||
| Wheelbase | 1448 mm (57.0 inches) | 1465 mm (57.7 inches) |
| Overall Length | 2129 mm (83.8 inches) | 2115 mm (83.3 inches) |
| Overall Width | 785 mm (30.9 inches) | 775 mm (30.5 inches) |
| Overall Height | 1074 mm (42.3 inches) | 1105 mm (43.5 inches) |
| Seat Height | ✓810 mm (31.9 inches) | ✓810 mm (31.9 inches) |
| Wet Weight | 206.8 kg (455.9 pounds) | ✓202.0 kg (445.3 pounds) |
| Fuel Capacity | ✓15.50 litres (4.09 US gallons) | 14.00 litres (3.70 US gallons) |
| Oil capacity | 2.70 litres (2.85 US quarts) | 3.90 litres (4.12 US quarts) |
"Best" (✓) reflects that single spec only, not overall suitability - a bike can win on paper and still be the wrong choice for you. Ties are all marked; specs with no clear better/worse direction (e.g. displacement, wheel size) are never marked, only tinted where bikes differ.
Affiliate links - we may earn a commission from qualifying eBay purchases made through these links.
This tool puts up to four motorcycles side by side across their full specification sheets, drawn from a database of 43,000+ models and 1.60M+ individual specifications. Wherever a spec has a clear "better" direction - more power, less weight - the strongest figure in that row is highlighted automatically.
Pick a make, model and year for each bike; the model and year lists update to match what you've selected. Two bikes are enough - use "Add another bike" for a third or fourth. Comparisons work across model years too, so you can compare a bike against its own earlier generation. Once you're happy with the lineup, use "Copy share link" to send it to someone else.
Specs are pulled from the same categories used throughout the site: engine and transmission (capacity, power, torque, gearbox), physical measures (weight, seat height, fuel and tank capacity), frame and dimensions, speed and acceleration, and brakes, suspension, frame and wheels (including tyres) - plus general information and maintenance data where it's on record for a bike.
A highlighted cell means one bike has the clearly better raw number for that spec - more power, less weight, and so on. Fields where "better" genuinely depends on the rider - seat height above all - are deliberately never highlighted: a lower seat isn't automatically the right choice, it's a fit question only you can answer. Winning a row also isn't the same as winning the comparison - a bike can lead on paper in half the rows and still be the wrong bike for you.
Yes - the tool doesn't restrict what you compare, though a highlighted spec means less when the two bikes aren't really doing the same job.
It shows as "-" and is never highlighted as a winner - a missing figure never beats one that's actually reported, and never blocks the rest of the row.
Yes - each bike's year list covers every model year in the database, so you can compare this year's bike against an earlier generation of the same model.
Every comparison has its own stable URL - use "Copy share link", or just copy the address bar. The same bikes in the same order always produce the same link.