The 2026 Honda XL750 Transalp is a middleweight adventure bike designed for riders seeking versatile on-and-off-road capability with refined road manners. Powered by a 755cc parallel-twin engine delivering accessible power and torque, it combines comfortable ergonomics with capable suspension travel suitable for mixed terrain exploration. Known for its approachable performance and balanced handling, it appeals to adventure enthusiasts and commuters alike.
The 2026 Zontes 703F Advendture is a middleweight adventure-tourer aimed at riders who want long-haul comfort without stepping up to a big-bore flagship. Its liquid-cooled 699 cc in-line triple delivers 93.9 hp with a smooth, torquey character, while the 22-litre tank and standard windscreen make light work of long days in the saddle. Best known for offering a lot of touring kit for the money.
Both are adventure bikes, so this is a like-for-like choice.
2026 Honda XL750 Transalp: Designed as a versatile do-it-all adventure bike that handles commuting, weekend touring, and light off-road exploring with equal competence.
2026 Zontes 703F Advendture: It's built as a versatile adventure-tourer, equally happy commuting, covering long highway miles, or tackling light gravel roads with its 19-inch front wheel and generous ground clearance.
Verdict: Choose the 2026 Honda XL750 Transalp if you want lighter weight. Choose the 2026 Zontes 703F Advendture if you want a lower seat and a bigger tank. Check the full table below for every figure, and the size comparison for fit.
| Specification | 2026 Honda XL750 Transalp | 2026 Zontes 703F Advendture |
|---|---|---|
| Other | ||
| Category | Adventure | Adventure |
| Color Options | White; Deep Pearl Gray | White, blue, black, gold, grey |
| Rake | 27º | - |
| Comments | - | Windscreen. Chinese brand. |
| Engine | ||
| Capacity: | 755.0 ccm (46.07 cubic inches) | 699.0 ccm (42.66 cubic inches) |
| Engine Type | Parallel Twin, four-stroke | In-line three-cylinder, four-stroke |
| Bore x Stroke | 87.0 x 63.5 mm (3.4 x 2.5 inches) | 70.0 x 60.6 mm (2.8 x 2.4 inches) |
| Compression | 11.0:1 | 13.0:1 |
| Cooling System | Liquid | Liquid |
| Fuel System | Injection | Injection |
| Starting | Electric | Electric & kick |
| Ignition | Full transistorized | Electric ignition |
| Valves Per Cylinder | 4 | - |
| Fuel Consumption | - | 5.00 litres/100 km (20.0 km/l or 47.04 mpg) |
| Performance | ||
| Power | 90.5 HP (66.6 kW) @ 9500 RPM | ✓93.9 HP (70.0 kW) @ 10000 RPM |
| Torque | ✓75.0 Nm (7.6 kgf-m or 55.3 ft.lbs) | 74.5 Nm (7.6 kgf-m or 54.9 ft.lbs) @ 8500 RPM |
| Power/Weight Ratio | 0.4351 HP/kg (dry) | 0.3896 HP/kg (wet) |
| Top Speed | - | 250.0 km/h (155.3 mph) |
| Chassis & suspension | ||
| Frame | Steel diamond | Aluminum alloy twin spar |
| Front Suspension | 43mm Showa SFF-CATM telescopic inverted fork w/ spring-preload adjustment; 7.9 in. travel | Telescopic fork |
| Rear Suspension | Pro-Link® system w/ single Showa remote-reservoir shock; 7.5 in. travel | Monoshock |
| Front Wheel Travel | 201 mm (7.9 inches) | - |
| Rear Wheel Travel | 191 mm (7.5 inches) | - |
| Rake (fork angle) | 27.0° | - |
| Trail | 111 mm (4.4 inches) | - |
| Ground Clearance | 211 mm (8.3 inches) | 190 mm (7.5 inches) |
| Transmission | ||
| Gearbox | 6-speed | 5-speed |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Final Drive | Chain | Chain |
| Clutch | Wet multiple, Assisted slipper clutch | Wet multi-disk |
| Brakes & wheels | ||
| Front Brakes | Dual hydraulic calipers w/ 310mm "wave" discs; ABS | Single disc. ABS |
| Front Brakes Diameter | 310 mm (12.2 inches) | - |
| Rear Brakes | Single hydraulic caliper w/ 256mm "wave" disc; ABS | Single disc. ABS |
| Rear Brakes Diameter | 256 mm (10.1 inches) | - |
| ABS | Yes | Yes |
| Front Tyre | 90/90-21 | 120/70-R19 |
| Rear Tyre | 150/70-18 | 170/60-R17 |
| Dimensions & weight | ||
| Wheelbase | 1562 mm (61.5 inches) | 1540 mm (60.6 inches) |
| Overall Length | 2325 mm (91.5 inches) | 2065 mm (81.3 inches) |
| Overall Width | 838 mm (33.0 inches) | 940 mm (37.0 inches) |
| Overall Height | 1455 mm (57.3 inches) | 1395 mm (54.9 inches) |
| Seat Height | 856 mm (33.7 inches) | ✓825 mm (32.5 inches) |
| Dry weight | 208.0 kg (458.6 pounds) | - |
| Wet Weight | ✓210.0 kg (463.0 pounds) | 241.0 kg (531.3 pounds) |
| Fuel Capacity | 16.90 litres (4.46 US gallons) | ✓22.00 litres (5.81 US gallons) |
| Oil capacity | 3.90 litres (4.12 US quarts) | - |
"Best" (✓) reflects that single spec only, not overall suitability - a bike can win on paper and still be the wrong choice for you. Ties are all marked; specs with no clear better/worse direction (e.g. displacement, wheel size) are never marked, only tinted where bikes differ.
Affiliate links - we may earn a commission from qualifying eBay purchases made through these links.
This tool puts up to four motorcycles side by side across their full specification sheets, drawn from a database of 43,000+ models and 1.60M+ individual specifications. Wherever a spec has a clear "better" direction - more power, less weight - the strongest figure in that row is highlighted automatically.
Pick a make, model and year for each bike; the model and year lists update to match what you've selected. Two bikes are enough - use "Add another bike" for a third or fourth. Comparisons work across model years too, so you can compare a bike against its own earlier generation. Once you're happy with the lineup, use "Copy share link" to send it to someone else.
Specs are pulled from the same categories used throughout the site: engine and transmission (capacity, power, torque, gearbox), physical measures (weight, seat height, fuel and tank capacity), frame and dimensions, speed and acceleration, and brakes, suspension, frame and wheels (including tyres) - plus general information and maintenance data where it's on record for a bike.
A highlighted cell means one bike has the clearly better raw number for that spec - more power, less weight, and so on. Fields where "better" genuinely depends on the rider - seat height above all - are deliberately never highlighted: a lower seat isn't automatically the right choice, it's a fit question only you can answer. Winning a row also isn't the same as winning the comparison - a bike can lead on paper in half the rows and still be the wrong bike for you.
Yes - the tool doesn't restrict what you compare, though a highlighted spec means less when the two bikes aren't really doing the same job.
It shows as "-" and is never highlighted as a winner - a missing figure never beats one that's actually reported, and never blocks the rest of the row.
Yes - each bike's year list covers every model year in the database, so you can compare this year's bike against an earlier generation of the same model.
Every comparison has its own stable URL - use "Copy share link", or just copy the address bar. The same bikes in the same order always produce the same link.