2026 Aprilia SXR 50 vs 2026 Kymco Agility 50 - Spec Comparison
Choose up to 4 bikes to compare
2026 Aprilia SXR 50
The Aprilia SXR 50 is an entry-level scooter designed for young riders and commuters seeking affordable urban mobility. Its lightweight 49cc four-stroke engine delivers efficient performance with fuel injection technology, while the SXR nameplate is known for combining sporty styling with practical everyday usability in the 50cc category.
2026 Kymco Agility 50
The 2026 Kymco Agility 50 is an entry-level scooter designed for new riders and urban commuters seeking affordable, reliable transportation. Its lightweight 50cc four-stroke engine delivers modest fuel efficiency and easy handling, making it ideal for navigating city streets and short daily commutes. Known for dependable performance and low maintenance costs, this scooter offers practical value for budget-conscious beginners.
2026 Aprilia SXR 50 vs 2026 Kymco Agility 50: the key differences
Both are scooters, so this is a like-for-like choice.
- The 2026 Aprilia SXR 50 carries 2 litres more fuel (7 vs 5 L).
2026 Aprilia SXR 50: Built purely for short urban commutes and running errands, not for speed or long-distance travel.
2026 Kymco Agility 50: It's built purely for short-hop urban commuting, running errands, and light neighborhood riding rather than any kind of performance or distance work.
Verdict: Choose the 2026 Aprilia SXR 50 if you want a bigger tank. Check the full table below for every figure, and the size comparison for fit.
| Specification | 2026 Aprilia SXR 50 | 2026 Kymco Agility 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Other | ||
| Category | Scooter | Scooter |
| Color Options | Enigma Black, Power Red, Essence White, Instinctive Grey | White, Gray |
| Carrying capacity | Underseat storage, 20 litres. Luggage rack. Optional 32 liter top box. | Underseat storage, rear rack |
| Comments | - | Kymco is made by Kwang Yang Motor Company, Taiwan. |
| Engine | ||
| Capacity: | 49.0 ccm (2.99 cubic inches) | 49.0 ccm (2.99 cubic inches) |
| Engine Type | Single, four-stroke | Single, four-stroke |
| Fuel Consumption | 2.40 litres/100 km (41.7 km/l or 98.01 mpg) | ✓2.10 litres/100 km (47.6 km/l or 112.01 mpg) |
| Bore x Stroke | 39.0 x 41.4 mm (1.5 x 1.6 inches) | 39.0 x 41.4 mm (1.5 x 1.6 inches) |
| Compression | 12.1:1 | 11.0:1 |
| Cooling System | Air | Air |
| Fuel System | Injection | Carburettor |
| Starting | Electric | Electric & kick |
| Ignition | CDI | CDI |
| Lubrication System | Wet Sump | - |
| CO2 Emissions | - | 47 CO2 g/km |
| EPA Est. Fuel Consumption | - | 2.00 L/100km (117.6 US mpg) |
| EPA CO Emissions | - | 2.3 CO g/km |
| Aspiration | - | Naturally aspirated |
| Valves Per Cylinder | - | 2 |
| Performance | ||
| Power | 3.2 HP (2.3 kW) @ 7000 RPM | ✓3.2 HP (2.4 kW) @ 8000 RPM |
| Torque | ✓3.3 Nm (0.3 kgf-m or 2.4 ft.lbs) @ 6250 RPM | 3.2 Nm (0.3 kgf-m or 2.4 ft.lbs) @ 7000 RPM |
| Power/Weight Ratio | 0.0296 HP/kg (wet) | 0.0346 HP/kg (dry) |
| Chassis & suspension | ||
| Frame | Single-cradle, tubular steel | Steel |
| Front Suspension | Telescopic hydraulic fork | Telescopic fork |
| Rear Suspension | Dual action single shock absorber, adjustable to 5 positions | Single-Damper Swing Arm with 5 Step Preload |
| Front Wheel Travel | 76 mm (3.0 inches) | 89 mm (3.5 inches) |
| Rear Wheel Travel | - | 81 mm (3.2 inches) |
| Ground Clearance | - | 140 mm (5.5 inches) |
| Brakes & wheels | ||
| Front Brakes | Single disc. Dual piston floating callipers | Single disc |
| Rear Brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Front Tyre | 120/70-12 | 120/70-12 |
| Rear Tyre | 120/70-12 | 130/70-12 |
| Front Brakes Diameter | - | 220 mm (8.7 inches) |
| Rear Brakes Diameter | - | 110 mm (4.3 inches) |
| Dimensions & weight | ||
| Wheelbase | 1360 mm (53.5 inches) | 1326 mm (52.2 inches) |
| Overall Length | 1965 mm (77.4 inches) | 1830 mm (72.0 inches) |
| Overall Width | 690 mm (27.2 inches) | 691 mm (27.2 inches) |
| Seat Height | ✓775 mm (30.5 inches) | 785 mm (30.9 inches) |
| Wet Weight | 108.0 kg (238.1 pounds) | - |
| Fuel Capacity | ✓7.00 litres (1.85 US gallons) | 5.00 litres (1.32 US gallons) |
| Overall Height | - | 1130 mm (44.5 inches) |
| Dry weight | - | 92.5 kg (203.9 pounds) |
| Transmission | ||
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Final Drive | Belt | Shaft |
| Clutch | Automatic centrifugal dry clutch | - |
| Gearbox | - | 5-speed |
"Best" (✓) reflects that single spec only, not overall suitability - a bike can win on paper and still be the wrong choice for you. Ties are all marked; specs with no clear better/worse direction (e.g. displacement, wheel size) are never marked, only tinted where bikes differ.
Affiliate links - we may earn a commission from qualifying eBay purchases made through these links.
About this comparison tool
This tool puts up to four motorcycles side by side across their full specification sheets, drawn from a database of 43,000+ models and 1.60M+ individual specifications. Wherever a spec has a clear "better" direction - more power, less weight - the strongest figure in that row is highlighted automatically.
How to use it
Pick a make, model and year for each bike; the model and year lists update to match what you've selected. Two bikes are enough - use "Add another bike" for a third or fourth. Comparisons work across model years too, so you can compare a bike against its own earlier generation. Once you're happy with the lineup, use "Copy share link" to send it to someone else.
What gets compared
Specs are pulled from the same categories used throughout the site: engine and transmission (capacity, power, torque, gearbox), physical measures (weight, seat height, fuel and tank capacity), frame and dimensions, speed and acceleration, and brakes, suspension, frame and wheels (including tyres) - plus general information and maintenance data where it's on record for a bike.
How the highlighting works, and its limits
A highlighted cell means one bike has the clearly better raw number for that spec - more power, less weight, and so on. Fields where "better" genuinely depends on the rider - seat height above all - are deliberately never highlighted: a lower seat isn't automatically the right choice, it's a fit question only you can answer. Winning a row also isn't the same as winning the comparison - a bike can lead on paper in half the rows and still be the wrong bike for you.
Frequently asked questions
Can I compare bikes from different categories, like a scooter against a superbike?
Yes - the tool doesn't restrict what you compare, though a highlighted spec means less when the two bikes aren't really doing the same job.
What happens if a spec is missing for one of the bikes?
It shows as "-" and is never highlighted as a winner - a missing figure never beats one that's actually reported, and never blocks the rest of the row.
Are older model years included?
Yes - each bike's year list covers every model year in the database, so you can compare this year's bike against an earlier generation of the same model.
How do I share a comparison?
Every comparison has its own stable URL - use "Copy share link", or just copy the address bar. The same bikes in the same order always produce the same link.