The Aprilia SXR 50 is an entry-level scooter designed for young riders and commuters seeking affordable urban mobility. Its lightweight 49cc four-stroke engine delivers efficient performance with fuel injection technology, while the SXR nameplate is known for combining sporty styling with practical everyday usability in the 50cc category.
The 2026 Peugeot Kisbee 50 Active is an entry-level automatic scooter designed for urban commuters and new riders seeking an economical, easy-to-ride vehicle. Powered by a modest 49.9cc four-stroke engine with 3.5 horsepower, it delivers exceptional fuel efficiency at 56.5 km/l while maintaining a practical top speed of 45 km/h. Best known for its straightforward reliability and low-cost operation, this lightweight scooter excels in city environments where affordability and simplicity are paramount.
Both are scooters, so this is a like-for-like choice.
2026 Aprilia SXR 50: Built purely for short urban commutes and running errands, not for speed or long-distance travel.
2026 Peugeot Kisbee 50 Active: It is purpose-built for short urban hops, errands, and commuting within city limits rather than any performance or adventure riding.
Verdict: Choose the 2026 Peugeot Kisbee 50 Active if you want lighter weight and a lower seat. Check the full table below for every figure, and the size comparison for fit.
| Specification | 2026 Aprilia SXR 50 | 2026 Peugeot Kisbee 50 Active |
|---|---|---|
| Other | ||
| Category | Scooter | Scooter |
| Color Options | Enigma Black, Power Red, Essence White, Instinctive Grey | White, Blue |
| Carrying capacity | Underseat storage, 20 litres. Luggage rack. Optional 32 liter top box. | - |
| Engine | ||
| Capacity: | 49.0 ccm (2.99 cubic inches) | 49.9 ccm (3.05 cubic inches) |
| Engine Type | Single, four-stroke | Single, four-stroke |
| Fuel Consumption | 2.40 litres/100 km (41.7 km/l or 98.01 mpg) | ✓1.80 litres/100 km (55.6 km/l or 130.68 mpg) |
| Bore x Stroke | 39.0 x 41.4 mm (1.5 x 1.6 inches) | 39.0 x 41.4 mm (1.5 x 1.6 inches) |
| Compression | 12.1:1 | - |
| Cooling System | Air | Air |
| Fuel System | Injection | Injection |
| Starting | Electric | Electric & kick |
| Ignition | CDI | - |
| Lubrication System | Wet Sump | - |
| Valves Per Cylinder | - | 2 |
| Performance | ||
| Power | 3.2 HP (2.3 kW) @ 7000 RPM | ✓3.5 HP (2.5 kW) @ 7700 RPM |
| Torque | ✓3.3 Nm (0.3 kgf-m or 2.4 ft.lbs) @ 6250 RPM | 3.2 Nm (0.3 kgf-m or 2.4 ft.lbs) @ 7300 RPM |
| Power/Weight Ratio | 0.0296 HP/kg (wet) | 0.0412 HP/kg (dry) |
| Top Speed | - | 45.0 km/h (28.0 mph) |
| Chassis & suspension | ||
| Frame | Single-cradle, tubular steel | Steel |
| Front Suspension | Telescopic hydraulic fork | Hydraulic telescopic fork |
| Rear Suspension | Dual action single shock absorber, adjustable to 5 positions | Hydraulic shock absorber |
| Front Wheel Travel | 76 mm (3.0 inches) | - |
| Brakes & wheels | ||
| Front Brakes | Single disc. Dual piston floating callipers | Single disc |
| Rear Brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Front Tyre | 120/70-12 | 110/70-12 |
| Rear Tyre | 120/70-12 | 110/70-12 |
| Front Brakes Diameter | - | 170 mm (6.7 inches) |
| Dimensions & weight | ||
| Wheelbase | 1360 mm (53.5 inches) | 1256 mm (49.4 inches) |
| Overall Length | 1965 mm (77.4 inches) | 1854 mm (73.0 inches) |
| Overall Width | 690 mm (27.2 inches) | 664 mm (26.1 inches) |
| Seat Height | 775 mm (30.5 inches) | ✓760 mm (29.9 inches) |
| Wet Weight | 108.0 kg (238.1 pounds) | ✓97.0 kg (213.8 pounds) |
| Fuel Capacity | ✓7.00 litres (1.85 US gallons) | 6.50 litres (1.72 US gallons) |
| Overall Height | - | 1156 mm (45.5 inches) |
| Dry weight | - | 85.0 kg (187.4 pounds) |
| Transmission | ||
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Final Drive | Belt | Belt |
| Clutch | Automatic centrifugal dry clutch | - |
"Best" (✓) reflects that single spec only, not overall suitability - a bike can win on paper and still be the wrong choice for you. Ties are all marked; specs with no clear better/worse direction (e.g. displacement, wheel size) are never marked, only tinted where bikes differ.
Affiliate links - we may earn a commission from qualifying eBay purchases made through these links.
This tool puts up to four motorcycles side by side across their full specification sheets, drawn from a database of 43,000+ models and 1.60M+ individual specifications. Wherever a spec has a clear "better" direction - more power, less weight - the strongest figure in that row is highlighted automatically.
Pick a make, model and year for each bike; the model and year lists update to match what you've selected. Two bikes are enough - use "Add another bike" for a third or fourth. Comparisons work across model years too, so you can compare a bike against its own earlier generation. Once you're happy with the lineup, use "Copy share link" to send it to someone else.
Specs are pulled from the same categories used throughout the site: engine and transmission (capacity, power, torque, gearbox), physical measures (weight, seat height, fuel and tank capacity), frame and dimensions, speed and acceleration, and brakes, suspension, frame and wheels (including tyres) - plus general information and maintenance data where it's on record for a bike.
A highlighted cell means one bike has the clearly better raw number for that spec - more power, less weight, and so on. Fields where "better" genuinely depends on the rider - seat height above all - are deliberately never highlighted: a lower seat isn't automatically the right choice, it's a fit question only you can answer. Winning a row also isn't the same as winning the comparison - a bike can lead on paper in half the rows and still be the wrong bike for you.
Yes - the tool doesn't restrict what you compare, though a highlighted spec means less when the two bikes aren't really doing the same job.
It shows as "-" and is never highlighted as a winner - a missing figure never beats one that's actually reported, and never blocks the rest of the row.
Yes - each bike's year list covers every model year in the database, so you can compare this year's bike against an earlier generation of the same model.
Every comparison has its own stable URL - use "Copy share link", or just copy the address bar. The same bikes in the same order always produce the same link.