2026 Bajaj Dominar 400 vs 2026 Yamaha MT-03 - Spec Comparison
Choose up to 4 bikes to compare
2026 Bajaj Dominar 400
The 2026 Bajaj Dominar 400 is a muscular naked bike for riders who want strong single-cylinder performance and long-distance comfort at an affordable price. Its 349cc liquid-cooled engine makes 40 hp and 33.2 Nm, with an 800 mm seat and a 13-litre tank.
2026 Yamaha MT-03
The 2026 Yamaha MT-03 is an accessible 321cc naked bike designed for new and intermediate riders seeking an agile, confidence-inspiring platform. Its parallel-twin engine delivers smooth, manageable power with a lightweight frame, making it ideal for urban commuting and spirited weekend riding. Known for its approachable performance and affordability, the MT-03 excels at teaching proper riding fundamentals.
2026 Bajaj Dominar 400 vs 2026 Yamaha MT-03: the key differences
Both are naked bikes, so this is a like-for-like choice.
- The 2026 Bajaj Dominar 400 has 3.6 Nm more torque (33.2 vs 29.6 Nm).
- The 2026 Yamaha MT-03 is 24 kg lighter (169 vs 193 kg).
- The 2026 Yamaha MT-03 has a 20 mm lower seat (780 vs 800 mm), which helps shorter riders.
2026 Bajaj Dominar 400: Designed for mixed commuting and weekend sport-touring duty rather than outright performance or racing.
2026 Yamaha MT-03: It's designed primarily for commuting, city riding, and learning the fundamentals of naked-sportbike handling and light cornering.
Verdict: Choose the 2026 Bajaj Dominar 400 if you want more torque. Choose the 2026 Yamaha MT-03 if you want lighter weight and a lower seat. Check the full table below for every figure, and the size comparison for fit.
| Specification | 2026 Bajaj Dominar 400 | 2026 Yamaha MT-03 |
|---|---|---|
| Other | ||
| Category | Naked | Naked |
| Color Options | Aurora Green, Charcoal Black | Team Yamaha Blue, Ice Storm, Matte Stealth Black |
| Comments | Windscreen. Sold in India. | LCD meter provides easy-to-absorb information. |
| Engine | ||
| Capacity: | 349.1 ccm (21.30 cubic inches) | 321.0 ccm (19.59 cubic inches) |
| Engine Type | Single, four-stroke | Parallel Twin, four-stroke |
| Cooling System | Liquid | Liquid |
| Fuel System | Injection | Injection |
| Starting | Electric | Electric |
| Valves Per Cylinder | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel Consumption | - | 4.20 litres/100 km (23.8 km/l or 56.00 mpg) |
| Bore x Stroke | - | 68.0 x 44.1 mm (2.7 x 1.7 inches) |
| Compression | - | 11.2:1 |
| Ignition | - | TCI |
| Lubrication System | - | Wet sump |
| Performance | ||
| Power | 40.0 HP (29.4 kW) @ 9000 RPM | ✓42.0 HP (30.7 kW) @ 10750 RPM |
| Torque | ✓33.2 Nm (3.4 kgf-m or 24.5 ft.lbs) @ 7500 RPM | 29.6 Nm (3.0 kgf-m or 21.8 ft.lbs) @ 9000 RPM |
| Power/Weight Ratio | 0.2073 HP/kg (wet) | 0.2482 HP/kg (wet) |
| 0-60 mph | - | 5.00 seconds |
| 0-100 km/h (0-62 mph) | - | 5.40 seconds |
| Chassis & suspension | ||
| Frame | Beam type perimeter | Diamond Tubular |
| Front Suspension | Telescopic, 43 mm USD Fork | KYB inverted forks, Ø37.0 mm inner tube |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-step adjustable Mono shock with Nitrox | Single shock; 7-step preload adjustable |
| Front Wheel Travel | 135 mm (5.3 inches) | 130 mm (5.1 inches) |
| Rear Wheel Travel | 110 mm (4.3 inches) | 125 mm (4.9 inches) |
| Ground Clearance | 157 mm (6.2 inches) | 160 mm (6.3 inches) |
| Rake (fork angle) | - | 25.0° |
| Trail | - | 95 mm (3.7 inches) |
| Transmission | ||
| Gearbox | 6-speed | 6-speed |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Final Drive | Chain | Chain |
| Clutch | Wet, Multiplate with Assist and Slipper Clutch | Multiplate wet |
| Brakes & wheels | ||
| Front Brakes | Single disc. ABS. | Single disc. ABS |
| Front Brakes Diameter | 320 mm (12.6 inches) | 298 mm (11.7 inches) |
| Rear Brakes | Single disc. ABS. | Single disc. ABS |
| ABS | Yes | Yes |
| Front Tyre | 110/70-17 | 110/70-R17 |
| Rear Tyre | 150/60-17 | 140/70-R17 |
| Dimensions & weight | ||
| Wheelbase | 1453 mm (57.2 inches) | 1380 mm (54.3 inches) |
| Overall Length | 2156 mm (84.9 inches) | 2090 mm (82.3 inches) |
| Overall Width | 863 mm (34.0 inches) | 754 mm (29.7 inches) |
| Overall Height | 1243 mm (48.9 inches) | 1069 mm (42.1 inches) |
| Seat Height | 800 mm (31.5 inches) | ✓780 mm (30.7 inches) |
| Wet Weight | 193.0 kg (425.5 pounds) | ✓169.2 kg (373.0 pounds) |
| Fuel Capacity | 13.00 litres (3.43 US gallons) | ✓14.00 litres (3.70 US gallons) |
| Oil capacity | - | 2.40 litres (2.54 US quarts) |
"Best" (✓) reflects that single spec only, not overall suitability - a bike can win on paper and still be the wrong choice for you. Ties are all marked; specs with no clear better/worse direction (e.g. displacement, wheel size) are never marked, only tinted where bikes differ.
Affiliate links - we may earn a commission from qualifying eBay purchases made through these links.
About this comparison tool
This tool puts up to four motorcycles side by side across their full specification sheets, drawn from a database of 43,000+ models and 1.60M+ individual specifications. Wherever a spec has a clear "better" direction - more power, less weight - the strongest figure in that row is highlighted automatically.
How to use it
Pick a make, model and year for each bike; the model and year lists update to match what you've selected. Two bikes are enough - use "Add another bike" for a third or fourth. Comparisons work across model years too, so you can compare a bike against its own earlier generation. Once you're happy with the lineup, use "Copy share link" to send it to someone else.
What gets compared
Specs are pulled from the same categories used throughout the site: engine and transmission (capacity, power, torque, gearbox), physical measures (weight, seat height, fuel and tank capacity), frame and dimensions, speed and acceleration, and brakes, suspension, frame and wheels (including tyres) - plus general information and maintenance data where it's on record for a bike.
How the highlighting works, and its limits
A highlighted cell means one bike has the clearly better raw number for that spec - more power, less weight, and so on. Fields where "better" genuinely depends on the rider - seat height above all - are deliberately never highlighted: a lower seat isn't automatically the right choice, it's a fit question only you can answer. Winning a row also isn't the same as winning the comparison - a bike can lead on paper in half the rows and still be the wrong bike for you.
Frequently asked questions
Can I compare bikes from different categories, like a scooter against a superbike?
Yes - the tool doesn't restrict what you compare, though a highlighted spec means less when the two bikes aren't really doing the same job.
What happens if a spec is missing for one of the bikes?
It shows as "-" and is never highlighted as a winner - a missing figure never beats one that's actually reported, and never blocks the rest of the row.
Are older model years included?
Yes - each bike's year list covers every model year in the database, so you can compare this year's bike against an earlier generation of the same model.
How do I share a comparison?
Every comparison has its own stable URL - use "Copy share link", or just copy the address bar. The same bikes in the same order always produce the same link.