2026 Benelli 302S vs 2026 Honda CB300R - Spec Comparison
Choose up to 4 bikes to compare
2026 Benelli 302S
The 2026 Benelli 302S is an approachable naked bike aimed at newer riders and urban commuters stepping up from smaller machines. Its 300 cc parallel twin delivers 32.2 hp with a smooth, rev-happy character, while the low 795 mm seat height and steel trellis frame keep it easy to manage. Best known for offering twin-cylinder refinement and big-bike presence at entry level.
2026 Honda CB300R
The Honda CB300R is a lightweight sport bike designed for beginner and intermediate riders seeking accessible performance and easy handling. Its 286cc single-cylinder engine delivers manageable power while maintaining nimble agility, making it ideal for urban commuting and track day introductions. Known for reliable Honda engineering and approachable ergonomics, the CB300R excels as a gateway to sportbike riding without intimidation. A factory ABS option was also available.
2026 Benelli 302S vs 2026 Honda CB300R: the key differences
Both are naked bikes, so this is a like-for-like choice.
- The 2026 Honda CB300R is 52 kg lighter (143 vs 195 kg).
- The 2026 Benelli 302S carries 6.2 litres more fuel (16 vs 9.8 L).
2026 Benelli 302S: Built primarily as an affordable, easy-going naked bike for commuting and everyday urban riding.
2026 Honda CB300R: Built primarily as a nimble urban commuter and learner-friendly street bike rather than a performance or adventure machine.
Verdict: Choose the 2026 Benelli 302S if you want a bigger tank. Choose the 2026 Honda CB300R if you want lighter weight. Check the full table below for every figure, and the size comparison for fit.
| Specification | 2026 Benelli 302S | 2026 Honda CB300R |
|---|---|---|
| Other | ||
| Category | Naked | Naked |
| Color Options | Red, Black, Yellow, Black/ Red | Pearl Dusk Yellow, Matte Black Metallic |
| Fuel Tank Material | Metal | Metal |
| Comments | - | Model ID: CBR300RA. |
| Rake | - | 24.8º |
| Engine | ||
| Capacity: | 300.0 ccm (18.31 cubic inches) | 286.0 ccm (17.45 cubic inches) |
| CO2 Emissions | ✓104 CO2 g/km | ✓71 CO2 g/km |
| EPA Certificate No. | TQJNC0.30MCA-003-R01 | THNXC0.29CFD-016 |
| EPA Est. Fuel Consumption | 4.44 L/100km (53.0 US mpg) | 3.02 L/100km (77.9 US mpg) |
| EPA CO Emissions | 2.7 CO g/km | 0.2 CO g/km |
| Engine Type | Parallel Twin, four-stroke | Single, four-stroke |
| Bore x Stroke | 65.0 x 45.2 mm (2.6 x 1.8 inches) | 76.0 x 63.0 mm (3.0 x 2.5 inches) |
| Compression | 12.0:1 | 10.7:1 |
| Cooling System | Liquid | Liquid |
| Fuel System | Injection | Injection |
| Starting | Electric | Electric |
| Ignition | TCI | Computer-controlled digital transistorized with electronic advance |
| Aspiration | Naturally aspirated | Naturally aspirated |
| Valves Per Cylinder | 4 | 4 |
| Lubrication System | Pressure splash | - |
| Fuel Consumption | - | 3.30 litres/100 km (30.3 km/l or 71.28 mpg) |
| Performance | ||
| Power | ✓32.2 HP (24.0 kW) @ 10500 RPM | 30.8 HP (22.7 kW) |
| Torque | ✓25.6 Nm (2.6 kgf-m or 18.9 ft.lbs) @ 9750 RPM | 22.9 Nm (2.3 kgf-m or 16.9 ft.lbs) |
| Power/Weight Ratio | 0.1651 HP/kg (wet) | 0.2149 HP/kg (wet) |
| Top Speed | 160.0 km/h (99.4 mph) | - |
| Chassis & suspension | ||
| Frame | Steel trellis | Steel tube |
| Front Suspension | Telescopic | 41mm inverted fork |
| Rear Suspension | Mono-shock-absorber, preload adjustable | Pro-Link® single shock |
| Front Wheel Travel | 135 mm (5.3 inches) | 130 mm (5.1 inches) |
| Rear Wheel Travel | 45 mm (1.8 inches) | 132 mm (5.2 inches) |
| Ground Clearance | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | 158 mm (6.2 inches) |
| Rake (fork angle) | - | 24.7° |
| Trail | - | 94 mm (3.7 inches) |
| Transmission | ||
| Gearbox | 6-speed | 6-speed |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Final Drive | Chain | Chain |
| Clutch | Wet multi-plate | Wet multiplate with coil springs |
| Brakes & wheels | ||
| Front Brakes | Double disc. 4 pistons caliper | Single disc. ABS |
| Front Brakes Diameter | 260 mm (10.2 inches) | 296 mm (11.7 inches) |
| Rear Brakes | Single disc. 2 pistons caliper | Single disc. ABS |
| Front Tyre | 120/70-ZR17 | 110/70-17 |
| Rear Tyre | 160/60-ZR17 | 150/60-17 |
| Rear Brakes Diameter | - | 220 mm (8.7 inches) |
| ABS | - | Optional |
| Dimensions & weight | ||
| Wheelbase | 1410 mm (55.5 inches) | 1328 mm (52.3 inches) |
| Overall Length | 2130 mm (83.9 inches) | 2017 mm (79.4 inches) |
| Overall Width | 800 mm (31.5 inches) | 803 mm (31.6 inches) |
| Overall Height | 1120 mm (44.1 inches) | 1052 mm (41.4 inches) |
| Seat Height | ✓795 mm (31.3 inches) | 803 mm (31.6 inches) |
| Wet Weight | 195.0 kg (429.9 pounds) | ✓143.3 kg (315.9 pounds) |
| Fuel Capacity | ✓16.00 litres (4.23 US gallons) | 9.80 litres (2.59 US gallons) |
"Best" (✓) reflects that single spec only, not overall suitability - a bike can win on paper and still be the wrong choice for you. Ties are all marked; specs with no clear better/worse direction (e.g. displacement, wheel size) are never marked, only tinted where bikes differ.
Affiliate links - we may earn a commission from qualifying eBay purchases made through these links.
About this comparison tool
This tool puts up to four motorcycles side by side across their full specification sheets, drawn from a database of 43,000+ models and 1.60M+ individual specifications. Wherever a spec has a clear "better" direction - more power, less weight - the strongest figure in that row is highlighted automatically.
How to use it
Pick a make, model and year for each bike; the model and year lists update to match what you've selected. Two bikes are enough - use "Add another bike" for a third or fourth. Comparisons work across model years too, so you can compare a bike against its own earlier generation. Once you're happy with the lineup, use "Copy share link" to send it to someone else.
What gets compared
Specs are pulled from the same categories used throughout the site: engine and transmission (capacity, power, torque, gearbox), physical measures (weight, seat height, fuel and tank capacity), frame and dimensions, speed and acceleration, and brakes, suspension, frame and wheels (including tyres) - plus general information and maintenance data where it's on record for a bike.
How the highlighting works, and its limits
A highlighted cell means one bike has the clearly better raw number for that spec - more power, less weight, and so on. Fields where "better" genuinely depends on the rider - seat height above all - are deliberately never highlighted: a lower seat isn't automatically the right choice, it's a fit question only you can answer. Winning a row also isn't the same as winning the comparison - a bike can lead on paper in half the rows and still be the wrong bike for you.
Frequently asked questions
Can I compare bikes from different categories, like a scooter against a superbike?
Yes - the tool doesn't restrict what you compare, though a highlighted spec means less when the two bikes aren't really doing the same job.
What happens if a spec is missing for one of the bikes?
It shows as "-" and is never highlighted as a winner - a missing figure never beats one that's actually reported, and never blocks the rest of the row.
Are older model years included?
Yes - each bike's year list covers every model year in the database, so you can compare this year's bike against an earlier generation of the same model.
How do I share a comparison?
Every comparison has its own stable URL - use "Copy share link", or just copy the address bar. The same bikes in the same order always produce the same link.