The 2026 Benelli TRK 702X is a versatile middleweight adventure bike powered by a 698cc twin-cylinder engine delivering 69 horsepower and strong mid-range torque. Designed for riders seeking comfortable long-distance touring with light off-road capability, it combines practical ergonomics with approachable performance and fuel efficiency. Best known for offering genuine adventure-touring character at an accessible price point.
The 2026 Suzuki V-Strom 650 is a versatile adventure-sport middleweight powered by a 645cc V-Twin engine producing 71 horsepower and 69 Nm of torque. Ideal for both novice and experienced riders, it excels as a capable all-rounder for commuting, touring, and light off-road exploration. Known for its balanced performance, manageable weight, and approachable character, the V-Strom 650 remains a popular choice for riders seeking adventure without overwhelming complexity.
Both are adventure bikes, so this is a like-for-like choice.
2026 Benelli TRK 702X: Built as an all-round adventure-tourer that mixes comfortable long-distance capability with light off-road versatility.
2026 Suzuki V-Strom 650: Built primarily as a versatile adventure-tourer for mixed pavement and light gravel road trips rather than outright speed or serious off-road work.
Verdict: Choose the 2026 Suzuki V-Strom 650 if you want lighter weight. Check the full table below for every figure, and the size comparison for fit.
| Specification | 2026 Benelli TRK 702X | 2026 Suzuki V-Strom 650 |
|---|---|---|
| Other | ||
| Category | Adventure | Adventure |
| Color Options | Anthracite Grey, Forest Green, Duna Sea | Pearl Vigor Blue |
| Fuel Tank Material | Metal | - |
| Carrying capacity | Rear rack | - |
| Comments | - | Advanced Traction Control System*, Easy Start System, Low RPM Assist. |
| Spark plugs | - | NGK MR8E-9 |
| Chain size | - | 525 |
| Engine | ||
| Capacity: | 698.0 ccm (42.59 cubic inches) | 645.0 ccm (39.36 cubic inches) |
| CO2 Emissions | 117 CO2 g/km | - |
| EPA Certificate No. | TQJNC.698MCA-004 | - |
| EPA Est. Fuel Consumption | 4.98 L/100km (47.2 US mpg) | - |
| EPA CO Emissions | 1.3 CO g/km | - |
| Engine Type | Parallel Twin, four-stroke | V-Twin, four-stroke |
| Bore x Stroke | 83.0 x 64.5 mm (3.3 x 2.5 inches) | 81.0 x 62.6 mm (3.2 x 2.5 inches) |
| Compression | 11.6:1 | 11.2:1 |
| Cooling System | Liquid | Liquid |
| Fuel System | Injection | Injection |
| Starting | Electric | Electric |
| Aspiration | Naturally aspirated | - |
| Valves Per Cylinder | 4 | - |
| Lubrication System | Pressure splash lubrication | Wet sump |
| Fuel Consumption | - | 3.50 litres/100 km (28.6 km/l or 67.20 mpg) |
| Ignition | - | Electronic |
| Performance | ||
| Power | 69.1 HP (50.4 kW) @ 8000 RPM | ✓71.0 HP (52.2 kW) @ 8800 RPM |
| Torque | ✓70.0 Nm (7.1 kgf-m or 51.6 ft.lbs) @ 6000 RPM | 69.0 Nm (7.0 kgf-m or 50.9 ft.lbs) @ 6300 RPM |
| Power/Weight Ratio | 0.3113 HP/kg (dry) | 0.3333 HP/kg (dry) |
| Top Speed | 180.0 km/h (111.8 mph) | ✓185.0 km/h (115.0 mph) |
| Chassis & suspension | ||
| Frame | Steel trellis | Twin-spar aluminum-alloy |
| Front Suspension | Upside down telescopic fork 50mm | Telescopic, coil spring, oil damped |
| Rear Suspension | Mono-shock-absorber | Link type, single shock, coil spring, oil damped |
| Front Wheel Travel | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | 150 mm (5.9 inches) |
| Ground Clearance | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | 170 mm (6.7 inches) |
| Rear Wheel Travel | - | 160 mm (6.3 inches) |
| Transmission | ||
| Gearbox | 6-speed | 6-speed |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Final Drive | Chain | Chain |
| Clutch | Wet multi-plate | Wet multiplate |
| Brakes & wheels | ||
| Front Brakes | Double disc. 4-piston, ABS | Double disc. Tokico 2-piston calipers. ABS. |
| Rear Brakes | Single disc. Single piston calliper, ABS | Single disc. Nissin, 1-piston. ABS. |
| ABS | Yes | Yes |
| Front Tyre | 110/80-R19 | 110/80R19 M/C (59V), tubeless |
| Rear Tyre | 150/70-ZR17 | 150/70R17 M/C (69V), tubeless |
| Dimensions & weight | ||
| Wheelbase | 1505 mm (59.3 inches) | 1560 mm (61.4 inches) |
| Overall Length | 2220 mm (87.4 inches) | 2275 mm (89.6 inches) |
| Overall Width | 925 mm (36.4 inches) | 835 mm (32.9 inches) |
| Overall Height | 1420 mm (55.9 inches) | 1405 mm (55.3 inches) |
| Seat Height | ✓830 mm (32.7 inches) | 835 mm (32.9 inches) |
| Dry weight | 222.0 kg (489.4 pounds) | ✓213.0 kg (469.6 pounds) |
| Wet Weight | 235.0 kg (518.1 pounds) | ✓213.0 kg (469.6 pounds) |
| Fuel Capacity | ✓20.00 litres (5.28 US gallons) | ✓20.00 litres (5.28 US gallons) |
"Best" (✓) reflects that single spec only, not overall suitability - a bike can win on paper and still be the wrong choice for you. Ties are all marked; specs with no clear better/worse direction (e.g. displacement, wheel size) are never marked, only tinted where bikes differ.
Affiliate links - we may earn a commission from qualifying eBay purchases made through these links.
This tool puts up to four motorcycles side by side across their full specification sheets, drawn from a database of 43,000+ models and 1.60M+ individual specifications. Wherever a spec has a clear "better" direction - more power, less weight - the strongest figure in that row is highlighted automatically.
Pick a make, model and year for each bike; the model and year lists update to match what you've selected. Two bikes are enough - use "Add another bike" for a third or fourth. Comparisons work across model years too, so you can compare a bike against its own earlier generation. Once you're happy with the lineup, use "Copy share link" to send it to someone else.
Specs are pulled from the same categories used throughout the site: engine and transmission (capacity, power, torque, gearbox), physical measures (weight, seat height, fuel and tank capacity), frame and dimensions, speed and acceleration, and brakes, suspension, frame and wheels (including tyres) - plus general information and maintenance data where it's on record for a bike.
A highlighted cell means one bike has the clearly better raw number for that spec - more power, less weight, and so on. Fields where "better" genuinely depends on the rider - seat height above all - are deliberately never highlighted: a lower seat isn't automatically the right choice, it's a fit question only you can answer. Winning a row also isn't the same as winning the comparison - a bike can lead on paper in half the rows and still be the wrong bike for you.
Yes - the tool doesn't restrict what you compare, though a highlighted spec means less when the two bikes aren't really doing the same job.
It shows as "-" and is never highlighted as a winner - a missing figure never beats one that's actually reported, and never blocks the rest of the row.
Yes - each bike's year list covers every model year in the database, so you can compare this year's bike against an earlier generation of the same model.
Every comparison has its own stable URL - use "Copy share link", or just copy the address bar. The same bikes in the same order always produce the same link.