The 2026 Honda Shadow Phantom ABS is a classic cruiser designed for riders seeking timeless style and reliable performance. Its 745cc V-twin engine delivers smooth, manageable power perfect for both highway cruising and urban riding. Known for its iconic shadow design, accessible riding position, and dependable ABS braking system, it appeals to cruiser enthusiasts valuing tradition and practicality.
The 2026 Suzuki Boulevard C50 is a mid-sized cruiser that appeals to riders seeking an accessible, manageable platform with classic styling and dependable performance. Powered by an 805cc V-twin engine producing 53 horsepower, it delivers approachable handling and low-end torque ideal for both novice and experienced cruiser enthusiasts. Known for its affordable pricing and proven reliability, the Boulevard C50 excels as an entry-level cruiser or practical weekend ride.
Both are cruisers, so this is a like-for-like choice.
2026 Honda Shadow Phantom ABS: It is built primarily for laid-back cruising and everyday street riding rather than outright performance or long-distance touring.
2026 Suzuki Boulevard C50: Built for laid-back boulevard cruising and short-to-medium range rides rather than outright speed or long-distance touring.
Verdict: Choose the 2026 Honda Shadow Phantom ABS if you want lighter weight and a lower seat. Choose the 2026 Suzuki Boulevard C50 if you want more power. Check the full table below for every figure, and the size comparison for fit.
| Specification | 2026 Honda Shadow Phantom ABS | 2026 Suzuki Boulevard C50 |
|---|---|---|
| Other | ||
| Category | Cruiser | Cruiser |
| Color Options | Flare Orange Metallic, Deep Pearl Gray | Solid Iron Gray |
| Comments | Model id: VT750CBS | - |
| Spark plugs | - | NGK DR7EA, DENSO XX22ESR-U |
| Engine | ||
| Capacity: | 745.0 ccm (45.46 cubic inches) | 805.0 ccm (49.12 cubic inches) |
| Engine Type | V-Twin, four-stroke | V-Twin, four-stroke |
| Fuel Consumption | 4.20 litres/100 km (23.8 km/l or 56.00 mpg) | - |
| Bore x Stroke | 79.0 x 76.0 mm (3.1 x 3.0 inches) | 83.0 x 74.4 mm (3.3 x 2.9 inches) |
| Compression | 9.6:1 | 9.4:1 |
| Cooling System | Liquid | Liquid |
| Fuel System | Injection | Injection |
| Starting | Electric | Electric |
| Ignition | Digital with 3-D mapping, two spark plugs per cylinder | Electronic |
| Valves Per Cylinder | 3 | 4 |
| Lubrication System | - | Wet sump |
| Performance | ||
| Power | 44.2 HP (32.5 kW) | ✓53.0 HP (38.7 kW) @ 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 65.0 Nm (6.6 kgf-m or 47.9 ft.lbs) @ 3500 RPM | ✓69.0 Nm (7.0 kgf-m or 50.9 ft.lbs) @ 3200 RPM |
| Power/Weight Ratio | 0.1762 HP/kg (wet) | 0.2154 HP/kg (dry) |
| Top Speed | - | 160.0 km/h (99.4 mph) |
| Transmission | ||
| Gearbox | 5-speed | 5-speed |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Final Drive | Shaft | Shaft |
| Clutch | Wet multiplate | Hydraulic clutch with back-torque limiter for smooth downshifts |
| Brakes & wheels | ||
| Front Brakes | Single disc. Two-piston calipers. | Single disc |
| Front Brakes Diameter | 296 mm (11.7 inches) | 300 mm (11.8 inches) |
| Rear Brakes | Single disc | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Front Tyre | 120/90-17 | 130/90-16 M/C (67H), tube type |
| Rear Tyre | 160/80-15 | 170/80-15 M/C (77H), tube type |
| Rear Brakes Diameter | - | 180 mm (7.1 inches) |
| Dimensions & weight | ||
| Wheelbase | 1638 mm (64.5 inches) | 1655 mm (65.2 inches) |
| Seat Height | ✓650 mm (25.6 inches) | 700 mm (27.6 inches) |
| Wet Weight | ✓250.8 kg (552.9 pounds) | 277.0 kg (610.7 pounds) |
| Fuel Capacity | 14.80 litres (3.91 US gallons) | ✓15.50 litres (4.09 US gallons) |
| Reserve fuel capacity | 3.40 litres (0.90 US gallons) | - |
| Overall Length | - | 2500 mm (98.4 inches) |
| Overall Width | - | 955 mm (37.6 inches) |
| Overall Height | - | 1110 mm (43.7 inches) |
| Dry weight | - | 246.0 kg (542.3 pounds) |
| Chassis & suspension | ||
| Front Suspension | 41mm fork | Telescopic, coil spring, oil damped |
| Rear Suspension | Dual shocks with five-position spring-preload adjustability | Link style, solo shock, coil spring, oil damped |
| Front Wheel Travel | 130 mm (5.1 inches) | 140 mm (5.5 inches) |
| Rear Wheel Travel | 89 mm (3.5 inches) | 105 mm (4.1 inches) |
| Rake (fork angle) | 34.0° | 33.0° |
| Trail | 161 mm (6.3 inches) | - |
| Frame | - | Double-cradle, steel |
| Ground Clearance | - | 140 mm (5.5 inches) |
"Best" (✓) reflects that single spec only, not overall suitability - a bike can win on paper and still be the wrong choice for you. Ties are all marked; specs with no clear better/worse direction (e.g. displacement, wheel size) are never marked, only tinted where bikes differ.
Affiliate links - we may earn a commission from qualifying eBay purchases made through these links.
This tool puts up to four motorcycles side by side across their full specification sheets, drawn from a database of 43,000+ models and 1.60M+ individual specifications. Wherever a spec has a clear "better" direction - more power, less weight - the strongest figure in that row is highlighted automatically.
Pick a make, model and year for each bike; the model and year lists update to match what you've selected. Two bikes are enough - use "Add another bike" for a third or fourth. Comparisons work across model years too, so you can compare a bike against its own earlier generation. Once you're happy with the lineup, use "Copy share link" to send it to someone else.
Specs are pulled from the same categories used throughout the site: engine and transmission (capacity, power, torque, gearbox), physical measures (weight, seat height, fuel and tank capacity), frame and dimensions, speed and acceleration, and brakes, suspension, frame and wheels (including tyres) - plus general information and maintenance data where it's on record for a bike.
A highlighted cell means one bike has the clearly better raw number for that spec - more power, less weight, and so on. Fields where "better" genuinely depends on the rider - seat height above all - are deliberately never highlighted: a lower seat isn't automatically the right choice, it's a fit question only you can answer. Winning a row also isn't the same as winning the comparison - a bike can lead on paper in half the rows and still be the wrong bike for you.
Yes - the tool doesn't restrict what you compare, though a highlighted spec means less when the two bikes aren't really doing the same job.
It shows as "-" and is never highlighted as a winner - a missing figure never beats one that's actually reported, and never blocks the rest of the row.
Yes - each bike's year list covers every model year in the database, so you can compare this year's bike against an earlier generation of the same model.
Every comparison has its own stable URL - use "Copy share link", or just copy the address bar. The same bikes in the same order always produce the same link.