2026 Italika RT200 vs 2026 Kawasaki W230 - Spec Comparison
Choose up to 4 bikes to compare
2026 Italika RT200
The 2026 Italika RT200 is a naked street bike for riders stepping up from a 125 who want more pull for commuting. The 200cc air-cooled single makes 14.7 hp, while a 780 mm seat, 130 kg dry weight and 16-litre tank make it a practical everyday machine.
2026 Kawasaki W230
The 2026 Kawasaki W230 is a lightweight classic motorcycle featuring a nimble 233cc single-cylinder engine, making it ideal for new riders and city commuters seeking authentic retro styling. Its air-cooled four-stroke powerplant delivers manageable power with modern fuel injection, while the classic design appeals to riders who prefer simplicity and vintage aesthetics over high performance. Best known for combining accessible handling with timeless retro character, it excels as an affordable entry point into motorcycle ownership.
2026 Italika RT200 vs 2026 Kawasaki W230: the key differences
Both are naked bikes, so this is a like-for-like choice.
- The 2026 Kawasaki W230 makes 3.1 hp more (14.7 vs 17.8 hp).
- The 2026 Kawasaki W230 has 4.6 Nm more torque (14 vs 18.6 Nm).
- The 2026 Kawasaki W230 has a 35 mm lower seat (745 vs 780 mm), which helps shorter riders.
- The 2026 Italika RT200 carries 4 litres more fuel (16 vs 12 L).
2026 Italika RT200: It's built primarily for affordable daily commuting and light urban sport riding rather than outright performance.
2026 Kawasaki W230: Built for relaxed, stylish urban riding and short leisurely rides rather than outright performance or distance touring.
Verdict: Choose the 2026 Italika RT200 if you want a bigger tank. Choose the 2026 Kawasaki W230 if you want more power, more torque and a lower seat. Check the full table below for every figure, and the size comparison for fit.
| Specification | 2026 Italika RT200 | 2026 Kawasaki W230 |
|---|---|---|
| Other | ||
| Category | Naked | Naked |
| Color Options | Black | Metallic Ocean Blue/Ebony |
| Fuel Tank Material | - | Metal |
| Engine | ||
| Capacity: | 200.0 ccm (12.20 cubic inches) | 233.0 ccm (14.22 cubic inches) |
| Engine Type | Single, four-stroke | Single, four-stroke |
| Fuel Consumption | 4.00 litres/100 km (25.0 km/l or 58.80 mpg) | ✓2.50 litres/100 km (40.0 km/l or 94.09 mpg) |
| Cooling System | Air | Air |
| Starting | Electric | Electric |
| Ignition | CDI | Digital |
| CO2 Emissions | - | 62 CO2 g/km |
| EPA Certificate No. | - | TKAXC.233AAC-003 |
| EPA Est. Fuel Consumption | - | 2.65 L/100km (88.8 US mpg) |
| EPA CO Emissions | - | 4.2 CO g/km |
| Bore x Stroke | - | 67.0 x 66.0 mm (2.6 x 2.6 inches) |
| Compression | - | 9.0:1 |
| Fuel System | - | Injection |
| Aspiration | - | Naturally aspirated |
| Valves Per Cylinder | - | 2 |
| Lubrication System | - | Forced lubrication, wet sump |
| Performance | ||
| Power | 14.7 HP (10.7 kW) @ 7500 RPM | ✓17.8 HP (13.1 kW) |
| Torque | 14.0 Nm (1.4 kgf-m or 10.3 ft.lbs) @ 6000 RPM | ✓18.6 Nm (1.9 kgf-m or 13.7 ft.lbs) @ 5800 RPM |
| Power/Weight Ratio | 0.1131 HP/kg (dry) | 0.1245 HP/kg (wet) |
| Top Speed | 116.0 km/h (72.1 mph) | - |
| Brakes & wheels | ||
| Front Brakes | Single disc | Single disc. Dual piston |
| Rear Brakes | Single disc | Single disc. Single piston |
| Front Tyre | 90/80-R17 | 90/90-M18 |
| Rear Tyre | 130/70-R17 | 110/90-M17 |
| Dimensions & weight | ||
| Overall Length | 1985 mm (78.1 inches) | 2125 mm (83.7 inches) |
| Overall Width | 812 mm (32.0 inches) | 800 mm (31.5 inches) |
| Overall Height | 1190 mm (46.9 inches) | 1090 mm (42.9 inches) |
| Seat Height | 780 mm (30.7 inches) | ✓745 mm (29.3 inches) |
| Dry weight | 130.0 kg (286.6 pounds) | - |
| Fuel Capacity | ✓16.00 litres (4.23 US gallons) | 12.00 litres (3.17 US gallons) |
| Wheelbase | - | 1415 mm (55.7 inches) |
| Wet Weight | - | 143.0 kg (315.3 pounds) |
| Chassis & suspension | ||
| Front Suspension | Telescopic fork | Telescopic fork, 37 mm |
| Rear Suspension | Monoshock with adjustable spring preload | Twin shocks with spring preload adjustability |
| Frame | - | Tubular, semi-double cradle |
| Trail | - | 99 mm (3.9 inches) |
| Ground Clearance | - | 150 mm (5.9 inches) |
| Transmission | ||
| Final Drive | Chain | Chain |
| Gearbox | - | 6-speed |
| Transmission Type | - | Manual |
| Clutch | - | Wet, multi disc |
"Best" (✓) reflects that single spec only, not overall suitability - a bike can win on paper and still be the wrong choice for you. Ties are all marked; specs with no clear better/worse direction (e.g. displacement, wheel size) are never marked, only tinted where bikes differ.
Affiliate links - we may earn a commission from qualifying eBay purchases made through these links.
About this comparison tool
This tool puts up to four motorcycles side by side across their full specification sheets, drawn from a database of 43,000+ models and 1.60M+ individual specifications. Wherever a spec has a clear "better" direction - more power, less weight - the strongest figure in that row is highlighted automatically.
How to use it
Pick a make, model and year for each bike; the model and year lists update to match what you've selected. Two bikes are enough - use "Add another bike" for a third or fourth. Comparisons work across model years too, so you can compare a bike against its own earlier generation. Once you're happy with the lineup, use "Copy share link" to send it to someone else.
What gets compared
Specs are pulled from the same categories used throughout the site: engine and transmission (capacity, power, torque, gearbox), physical measures (weight, seat height, fuel and tank capacity), frame and dimensions, speed and acceleration, and brakes, suspension, frame and wheels (including tyres) - plus general information and maintenance data where it's on record for a bike.
How the highlighting works, and its limits
A highlighted cell means one bike has the clearly better raw number for that spec - more power, less weight, and so on. Fields where "better" genuinely depends on the rider - seat height above all - are deliberately never highlighted: a lower seat isn't automatically the right choice, it's a fit question only you can answer. Winning a row also isn't the same as winning the comparison - a bike can lead on paper in half the rows and still be the wrong bike for you.
Frequently asked questions
Can I compare bikes from different categories, like a scooter against a superbike?
Yes - the tool doesn't restrict what you compare, though a highlighted spec means less when the two bikes aren't really doing the same job.
What happens if a spec is missing for one of the bikes?
It shows as "-" and is never highlighted as a winner - a missing figure never beats one that's actually reported, and never blocks the rest of the row.
Are older model years included?
Yes - each bike's year list covers every model year in the database, so you can compare this year's bike against an earlier generation of the same model.
How do I share a comparison?
Every comparison has its own stable URL - use "Copy share link", or just copy the address bar. The same bikes in the same order always produce the same link.