The 2026 Suzuki Boulevard C50T is a classic touring cruiser for riders who value relaxed highway miles over outright speed. Its 805 cc liquid-cooled V-twin delivers 69 Nm of torque low down at 3200 rpm, paired with a smooth shaft final drive. It is best known for its traditional styling, low 700 mm seat and large removable, height-adjustable windshield.
The 2026 Yamaha Bolt R-Spec is a nimble custom cruiser designed for riders seeking manageable power and retro styling in an accessible package. Its 942cc V-twin engine delivers smooth torque at low RPMs, making it ideal for urban commuting and weekend cruising. Known for its affordable price point and classic design, the Bolt R-Spec appeals to entry-level and experienced cruiser enthusiasts alike.
Both are cruisers, so this is a like-for-like choice.
2026 Suzuki Boulevard C50T: Designed for relaxed highway cruising and light touring rather than outright speed or sporty cornering.
2026 Yamaha Bolt R-Spec: Built as a stylish, customizable V-twin cruiser for laid-back street riding rather than outright performance.
Verdict: Choose the 2026 Suzuki Boulevard C50T if you want a bigger tank. Choose the 2026 Yamaha Bolt R-Spec if you want more power, more torque and lighter weight. Check the full table below for every figure, and the size comparison for fit.
| Specification | 2026 Suzuki Boulevard C50T | 2026 Yamaha Bolt R-Spec |
|---|---|---|
| Other | ||
| Category | Cruiser | Cruiser |
| Color Options | Pearl Brilliant White | Raven black. |
| Comments | Large removable, height-adjustable windshield. | Designed with owner customization in mind. |
| Engine | ||
| Capacity: | 805.0 ccm (49.12 cubic inches) | 942.0 ccm (57.48 cubic inches) |
| Engine Type | V-Twin, four-stroke | V-Twin, four-stroke |
| Bore x Stroke | 83.0 x 74.4 mm (3.3 x 2.9 inches) | 85.0 x 83.0 mm (3.3 x 3.3 inches) |
| Compression | 9.4:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Cooling System | Liquid | Air |
| Fuel System | Injection | Injection |
| Starting | Electric | Electric |
| Ignition | Electronic | TCI |
| Valves Per Cylinder | 4 | 4 |
| Lubrication System | Wet sump | Wet Sump |
| Fuel Consumption | - | 4.60 litres/100 km (21.7 km/l or 51.13 mpg) |
| Performance | ||
| Power | 50.0 HP (37.3 kW) @ 6000 RPM | ✓54.0 HP (39.7 kW) |
| Torque | 69.0 Nm (7.0 kgf-m or 50.9 ft.lbs) @ 3200 RPM | ✓80.4 Nm (8.2 kgf-m or 59.3 ft.lbs) @ 3000 RPM |
| Power/Weight Ratio | 0.2033 HP/kg (dry) | 0.2196 HP/kg (wet) |
| Chassis & suspension | ||
| Frame | Double-cradle steel | Aluminum double-cradle |
| Front Suspension | Telescopic, coil spring, oil damped | Telescopic fork 41mm |
| Rear Suspension | Link style, solo shock, coil spring, oil damped | Dual piggyback shocks |
| Front Wheel Travel | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | 120 mm (4.7 inches) |
| Rear Wheel Travel | 105 mm (4.1 inches) | 70 mm (2.8 inches) |
| Rake (fork angle) | 33.0° | 29.0° |
| Ground Clearance | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | 130 mm (5.1 inches) |
| Trail | - | 130 mm (5.1 inches) |
| Transmission | ||
| Gearbox | 5-speed | 5-speed |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Final Drive | Shaft | Belt |
| Clutch | Hydraulic clutch | Multiplate wet clutch |
| Brakes & wheels | ||
| Front Brakes | Single disc | Single disc. Hydraulic |
| Front Brakes Diameter | 300 mm (11.8 inches) | 298 mm (11.7 inches) |
| Rear Brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Single disc. Hydraulic |
| Rear Brakes Diameter | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | 298 mm (11.7 inches) |
| Front Tyre | 130/90-16 | 100/90-19 |
| Rear Tyre | 170/80-15 | 150/80-16 |
| Dimensions & weight | ||
| Wheelbase | 1655 mm (65.2 inches) | 1570 mm (61.8 inches) |
| Overall Length | 2500 mm (98.4 inches) | 2290 mm (90.2 inches) |
| Overall Width | 955 mm (37.6 inches) | 945 mm (37.2 inches) |
| Overall Height | 1110 mm (43.7 inches) | 1120 mm (44.1 inches) |
| Seat Height | 700 mm (27.6 inches) | ✓690 mm (27.2 inches) |
| Dry weight | 246.0 kg (542.3 pounds) | - |
| Wet Weight | 292.0 kg (643.7 pounds) | ✓245.9 kg (542.1 pounds) |
| Fuel Capacity | ✓15.50 litres (4.09 US gallons) | 13.00 litres (3.43 US gallons) |
"Best" (✓) reflects that single spec only, not overall suitability - a bike can win on paper and still be the wrong choice for you. Ties are all marked; specs with no clear better/worse direction (e.g. displacement, wheel size) are never marked, only tinted where bikes differ.
Affiliate links - we may earn a commission from qualifying eBay purchases made through these links.
This tool puts up to four motorcycles side by side across their full specification sheets, drawn from a database of 43,000+ models and 1.60M+ individual specifications. Wherever a spec has a clear "better" direction - more power, less weight - the strongest figure in that row is highlighted automatically.
Pick a make, model and year for each bike; the model and year lists update to match what you've selected. Two bikes are enough - use "Add another bike" for a third or fourth. Comparisons work across model years too, so you can compare a bike against its own earlier generation. Once you're happy with the lineup, use "Copy share link" to send it to someone else.
Specs are pulled from the same categories used throughout the site: engine and transmission (capacity, power, torque, gearbox), physical measures (weight, seat height, fuel and tank capacity), frame and dimensions, speed and acceleration, and brakes, suspension, frame and wheels (including tyres) - plus general information and maintenance data where it's on record for a bike.
A highlighted cell means one bike has the clearly better raw number for that spec - more power, less weight, and so on. Fields where "better" genuinely depends on the rider - seat height above all - are deliberately never highlighted: a lower seat isn't automatically the right choice, it's a fit question only you can answer. Winning a row also isn't the same as winning the comparison - a bike can lead on paper in half the rows and still be the wrong bike for you.
Yes - the tool doesn't restrict what you compare, though a highlighted spec means less when the two bikes aren't really doing the same job.
It shows as "-" and is never highlighted as a winner - a missing figure never beats one that's actually reported, and never blocks the rest of the row.
Yes - each bike's year list covers every model year in the database, so you can compare this year's bike against an earlier generation of the same model.
Every comparison has its own stable URL - use "Copy share link", or just copy the address bar. The same bikes in the same order always produce the same link.