The 2026 Suzuki SV650 is a versatile middleweight naked bike powered by a responsive 645cc V-Twin engine producing 73 horsepower. Ideal for beginners and experienced riders alike, it delivers a perfect balance of manageable power, agile handling, and affordability, making it a timeless choice for everyday riding and weekend adventures.
The 2026 Yamaha MT-07 is a middleweight naked bike for riders who want punchy, accessible performance without a fairing. Its 689cc liquid-cooled parallel twin makes 72.4 hp and 68 Nm, while an 805 mm seat, 183 kg wet weight and standard ABS make it as easy to commute on as it is fun on a back road.
Both are naked bikes, so this is a like-for-like choice.
2026 Suzuki SV650: A versatile naked roadster built for spirited street riding, commuting, and learning proper cornering technique rather than outright speed or long-distance touring.
2026 Yamaha MT-07: A versatile naked roadster built for lively commuting, weekend backroad fun, and light sport riding rather than outright performance or adventure use.
Verdict: Choose the 2026 Suzuki SV650 if you want a lower seat. Choose the 2026 Yamaha MT-07 if you want lighter weight. Check the full table below for every figure, and the size comparison for fit.
| Specification | 2026 Suzuki SV650 | 2026 Yamaha MT-07 |
|---|---|---|
| Other | ||
| Category | Naked | Naked |
| Color Options | Pearl Matte Shadow Green/Metallic Matte Black | ,Team Yamaha Blue, Ice Storm, Matte Charcoal Black |
| Fork tube size | - | 41 mm (1.6 inches) |
| Spark plugs | - | NGK LMAR8A-9 |
| Brake fluid | - | DOT 4 |
| Tire pressure front | - | 33 PSI (2.3 Bar or 230 kPa) |
| Tire pressure rear | - | 36 PSI (2.5 Bar or 250 kPa) |
| Sprockets | - | 16/43 (front/rear) |
| Chain size | - | 525 |
| Engine | ||
| Capacity: | 645.0 ccm (39.36 cubic inches) | 689.0 ccm (42.05 cubic inches) |
| Engine Type | V-Twin, four-stroke | Parallel Twin, four-stroke |
| Fuel Consumption | ✓3.40 litres/100 km (29.4 km/l or 69.18 mpg) | 4.20 litres/100 km (23.8 km/l or 56.00 mpg) |
| Bore x Stroke | 81.0 x 62.6 mm (3.2 x 2.5 inches) | 80.0 x 68.6 mm (3.1 x 2.7 inches) |
| Compression | 11.2:1 | 11.5:1 |
| Cooling System | Liquid | Liquid |
| Fuel System | Injection | Injection |
| Starting | Electric | Electric |
| Ignition | Transistorised | TCI |
| Valves Per Cylinder | 2 | 4 |
| Lubrication System | Wet sump | Wet sump |
| CO2 Emissions | - | 100 CO2 g/km |
| Performance | ||
| Power | 73.0 HP (53.3 kW) @ 8500 RPM | ✓72.4 HP (54.0 kW) @ 8750 RPM |
| Torque | 64.0 Nm (6.5 kgf-m or 47.2 ft.lbs) @ 6800 RPM | ✓68.0 Nm (6.9 kgf-m or 50.2 ft.lbs) @ 6500 RPM |
| Power/Weight Ratio | 0.4345 HP/kg (dry) | 0.4137 HP/kg (dry) |
| Chassis & suspension | ||
| Frame | Trellis, steel | Diamond |
| Front Suspension | Telescopic, coil spring, oil damped | 41mm KYB telescopic fork |
| Rear Suspension | Link type, single shock, coil spring, oil damped | KYB Single shock, adjustable preload and rebound damping |
| Front Wheel Travel | 125 mm (4.9 inches) | 130 mm (5.1 inches) |
| Rear Wheel Travel | 63 mm (2.5 inches) | 130 mm (5.1 inches) |
| Rake (fork angle) | 25.0° | 24.3° |
| Trail | 104 mm (4.1 inches) | 93 mm (3.7 inches) |
| Ground Clearance | 135 mm (5.3 inches) | 150 mm (5.9 inches) |
| Transmission | ||
| Gearbox | 6-speed | 6-speed |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Final Drive | Chain | Chain |
| Clutch | Wet, multi-plate | Wet, Multiple Disc |
| Brakes & wheels | ||
| Front Brakes | Double disc. 4-piston calipers. Optional ABS. | Double disc. Hydraulic.4-piston calipers. ABS. |
| Front Brakes Diameter | 290 mm (11.4 inches) | 298 mm (11.7 inches) |
| Rear Brakes | Single disc. 1-piston caliper. Optional ABS. | Single disc. Hydraulic single disc. ABS. |
| Rear Brakes Diameter | 240 mm (9.4 inches) | 245 mm (9.6 inches) |
| ABS | Optional | Yes |
| Front Tyre | 120/70-ZR17 | 120/70ZR17 M/C (58W) |
| Rear Tyre | 160/60-ZR17 | 180/55ZR17 M/C (73W) |
| Dimensions & weight | ||
| Wheelbase | 1445 mm (56.9 inches) | 1395 mm (54.9 inches) |
| Overall Length | 2140 mm (84.3 inches) | 2065 mm (81.3 inches) |
| Overall Width | 760 mm (29.9 inches) | 780 mm (30.7 inches) |
| Overall Height | 1090 mm (42.9 inches) | 1110 mm (43.7 inches) |
| Seat Height | ✓785 mm (30.9 inches) | 805 mm (31.7 inches) |
| Dry weight | ✓168.0 kg (370.4 pounds) | 175.0 kg (385.8 pounds) |
| Wet Weight | 198.0 kg (436.5 pounds) | ✓183.0 kg (403.4 pounds) |
| Fuel Capacity | ✓14.50 litres (3.83 US gallons) | 14.00 litres (3.70 US gallons) |
| Oil capacity | - | 3.00 litres (3.17 US quarts) |
"Best" (✓) reflects that single spec only, not overall suitability - a bike can win on paper and still be the wrong choice for you. Ties are all marked; specs with no clear better/worse direction (e.g. displacement, wheel size) are never marked, only tinted where bikes differ.
Affiliate links - we may earn a commission from qualifying eBay purchases made through these links.
This tool puts up to four motorcycles side by side across their full specification sheets, drawn from a database of 43,000+ models and 1.60M+ individual specifications. Wherever a spec has a clear "better" direction - more power, less weight - the strongest figure in that row is highlighted automatically.
Pick a make, model and year for each bike; the model and year lists update to match what you've selected. Two bikes are enough - use "Add another bike" for a third or fourth. Comparisons work across model years too, so you can compare a bike against its own earlier generation. Once you're happy with the lineup, use "Copy share link" to send it to someone else.
Specs are pulled from the same categories used throughout the site: engine and transmission (capacity, power, torque, gearbox), physical measures (weight, seat height, fuel and tank capacity), frame and dimensions, speed and acceleration, and brakes, suspension, frame and wheels (including tyres) - plus general information and maintenance data where it's on record for a bike.
A highlighted cell means one bike has the clearly better raw number for that spec - more power, less weight, and so on. Fields where "better" genuinely depends on the rider - seat height above all - are deliberately never highlighted: a lower seat isn't automatically the right choice, it's a fit question only you can answer. Winning a row also isn't the same as winning the comparison - a bike can lead on paper in half the rows and still be the wrong bike for you.
Yes - the tool doesn't restrict what you compare, though a highlighted spec means less when the two bikes aren't really doing the same job.
It shows as "-" and is never highlighted as a winner - a missing figure never beats one that's actually reported, and never blocks the rest of the row.
Yes - each bike's year list covers every model year in the database, so you can compare this year's bike against an earlier generation of the same model.
Every comparison has its own stable URL - use "Copy share link", or just copy the address bar. The same bikes in the same order always produce the same link.